December 17, 2004

hire hugh(train)

zzzzzz7654105.jpg
THE HUGHTRAIN: “THE MARKET FOR SOMETHING TO BELIEVE IN IS INFINITE.”

We are here to find mea­ning. We are here to help other peo­ple do the same. Everything else is secon­dary.
We humans want to believe in our own spe­cies. And we want peo­ple, com­pa­nies and pro­ducts in our lives that make it easier to do so. That is human nature.

Ear­lier I star­ted drop­ping hints about how I plan to make The Hugh­train com­mer­cially via­ble, to myself and others.
Though this is not my only idea, this is a main one:

If you like The Hugh­train, and would like me to help you apply it to your own busi­ness, you can now hire me as your very own Hugh­train Con­sul­tant.
You pay me a sim­ple monthly retai­ner fee of $500, for which in return I impart what I know in a way that directly helps your busi­ness.
The basic mecha­nisms for exchange are e-mails, AIM and phone calls. We can also colla­bo­rate via pri­vate blogs and wikis.
New clients can sign up for a sin­gle month– after that the con­tract can be rene­wed for 6 or 12 months.
Che­mistry and con­ver­sa­tion is key to this pro­cess. I retain the right to bow out of the 6 and 12 month con­tracts with one month’s notice.
Before work proc­cee­ding or money chan­ging hangs, both par­ties would be expec­ted to have a pretty clear and mutally-agreed idea of what out­co­mes and out­puts are to be expec­ted. I expect $500 per month to be extre­mely good value for money, as long as both par­ties unders­tand the basic para­me­ters. Obviously, I’m not selling this stuff for $5 an hour. But I’ not selling it for $500 an hour, either.
I look for­ward to colla­bo­ra­ting with you.

So, do you think there’d be a mar­ket for this kind of ser­vice? I’m thin­king, if I could help add real bene­fit, tops­pin etc to other people’s busi­nes­ses, they wouldn’t begrudge $3-6K.
Please feel free to leave com­ments. I think this idea has some poten­tial. Inte­res­ted to hear what y’all think.
And cer­tainly, if any­body is seriously inte­res­ted in under­ta­king this idea/offer, by all means please drop me an email:
hugh at gaping­void etc.
[UPDATE:] I’m begin­ning to agree with some of the folks who left com­ments here (Thanks, Every­body!). I think it would be far easier to find and manage 4 clients willing to pay $3K a month than to find and manage 24 clients willing to pay $500 a month. Perhaps I should raise my fee…

24 Responses to “hire hugh(train)”

  1. Watson says:

    Okay.
    I’m in.
    Yeah, there’s a mar­ket for it. You.
    Been stud­ying your site while con­cu­rrently deve­lo­ping a wee busi­ness. It’s been a great ins­pi­ra­tion.
    Call your site “Gaping Void Uni­ver­sity” on my own blog, and I’m matri­cu­la­ted.
    Of course you should be paid.

  2. DK says:

    i think you defi­na­tely have a good USP ready for the take-up. good luck with it fella…
    some cle­ver bug­ger once said ‘there are riches in niches’! i’m sold…
    regards and chrimbo cheer
    DK

  3. Teemu Arina says:

    This is abso­lu­tely on my list of best ways to use your money to improve your busi­ness, be it small or big.
    Will recom­mend to everyone.

  4. Jeff Risley says:

    There’s most defi­ni­tely a mar­ket for your ser­vice. Focus on SME’s that your $500 retai­ner will appeal to and who are dying for a way to get the word out about them­sel­ves. A pos­si­ble place to find these folks: try get­ting buddy-buddy with some pri­vate equity firms in your area — ones that work with small to medium sized com­pa­nies. The PE’s are always recom­men­ding exper­tise to their por­to­filo com­pa­nies (accoun­tants, law­yers, etc.). Why not you? You can find PE’s through the Asso­cia­tion for Cor­po­rate Growth (acg.org). I’m a mem­ber of the ACG Kan­sas City chap­ter.
    Hugh, there’s a small group of us inside our ad agency/pr firm trying to do what you’re doing…reinvent our busi­ness. We call it “mel­ting the ice­cube.” I dis­cuss it on my blog, and I’d love to hear your thoughts.

  5. Send me an email, big man.

  6. Josef says:

    Too cheap, sounds like you doubt anyone will really buy it. Maybe a few peo­ple who read you here who also hap­pen to be res­pon­si­ble for the petty cash for the bis­cuit tin in the con­glo­me­rate will sup­port you, but I’d advise pri­cing your ser­vice in such a way as to reflect real worth and lack of self-doubt on your part.
    Your honesty is to be admi­red, and I rea­lise that’s part of your mes­sage, but when it comes to a busi­ness sig­ning on the dot­ted line this sounds half-cocked and thro­wa­way. A bit like beg­ging. Rethink, reprice, relaunch, expunge this emba­rrass­ment. Good advice for free Hugh. (Also get your spe­lling right when asking for money!)

  7. cynthia says:

    i would think that the fee would be appro­priate if you’re loo­king to work with small and nim­ble com­pa­nies and not neces­sa­rily big crusty ones.

  8. david says:

    I think you are under­va­luing your­self. $500 is poc­ket change.

  9. Doc Searls says:

    Dollars? Make it EUROS, dude.
    Dollars are the new pesos.

  10. Firas says:

    Agree with Josef. This reminds me of your effort to get a gapingblog.com star­ted. Screw blog entries, make a page at:
    gapingvoid.com/services
    Con­tract a cop­ye­di­tor – and if pos­si­ble, a web desig­ner – and don’t make excu­ses for your price. (Ins­tead of if ‘any­body is seriously inte­res­ted’, say ‘email me now to have a pri­mary eva­lu­tion done (with some reom­men­da­tions) for $xxx, after which a $500 con­tract can be arran­ged.) And of course, after you’re done, get in touch with said desig­ner and make a portfolio/case study.
    But you knew this. I’m just pushing the point.

  11. David Burn says:

    $50,000 for a collec­tion of ori­gi­nal sketches on the back of busi­ness cards?
    $500 for a month of Hugh Train con­sul­ting?
    You might do well to move some zeros around.
    But what do I know? I’m as tap­ped as you claim to be.

  12. Ben Wharton says:

    Hugh -
    I think there’s a mar­ket for “Ins­pi­ra­tio­nal Words to the Lost-At-Sea Middle-Managers of Cor­po­rate Cul­ture”.
    But as someone who has seen the most basic screw-ups occur when outside con­sul­tants, espe­cially in the IT industry, are brought in to bring a “New Way of Thin­king” via a “New Way of Wor­king” pro­mo­ting “A New Way of Being” into an esta­blished busi­ness cul­ture, you’re sta­ring down the dou­ble barrel of the most basic of issues.
    While there are gene­ra­li­sa­tions to be made about sys­tems, it’s the mul­ti­tude of excep­tions that desc­ribe the rea­li­ties of an indi­vi­dual sys­tem.
    It takes time, a fair whack of time, invol­ving many points of views, espe­cially those views of peo­ple who ARE NOT the ones at the top of the food chain to begin to unders­tand what is actually going on behind an organisation’s facade. Much of it will be his­to­ri­cal, much of it will be to do with per­so­na­lity traits, most of it will be unsaid — but unders­tood by those within the com­pany.
    And being on the end of a telephone, email, SMS, sys­tem, wha­te­ver, means you’re out of the loop. You’re not only out of the loop, you’re pro­bably tal­king to the wrong per­son. And that per­son may well be part of the issue that he or she is unwi­lling or una­ble to dis­cuss.
    Going for the Distance-Learning route may seem neat and low-maintenance for the ad man who’s been get­ting ever­yone to come to him so he can use them as a very large soun­ding board, but it’s not the way to solve the pro­blems of the com­pa­nies you are clai­ming you are going to help.
    ACTUALLY I’ve just had cou­ple of inte­res­ting ideas and after re-reading you ini­tial pos­ting maybe you’re already there with one of them. It’s all about focus and who’s invol­ved in the con­ver­sa­tion. The way I see it you couldn’t do the thing for $500/a month. You’d do it in a far more con­cen­tra­ted time scale and for more money… mail me Hugh, if yah want to know if we’re thin­king in the same direction.

  13. richard says:

    I’d say that the Intro­duc­tory Offer of $500 would be a great first month, so long as you can place limits on the amount of time you dedi­cate to any one client…

  14. Citizen K says:

    plas­tics.

  15. Dawn says:

    I can do bet­ter than this. How would you like to earn $24 a month for each one of your rea­ders? Res­pond to my email from 12/16 and we’ll talk about it.

  16. Jon Husband says:

    It’s a tried-and-true busi­ness model for startegic-thinking con­sul­tants who want to offer con­sis­tent value-added ser­vi­ces to a client, and one I much favour. Why ? Because it allows a con­sul­tant and a client orga­ni­za­tion to grow together and make real the old saw of “unders­tan­ding your busi­ness and cul­ture”. It’s also put up against the always-larger “I’ve got the solu­tion for you” con­sul­ting, which is 90% of the time a big fat lie but easier for many to wrap their heads around and buy.
    I think the whole point is that a rela­ti­vely easy-to-swallow retai­ner fee for real and ongoing value makes a lot of sense … tho’ I agree with your other rea­ders that $500 is too little … won’t be taken seriously. $2000 or $3000 is still appro­xi­ma­tely what it would take on a monthly basis even to hire tem­po­rary admin assis­tants … the whole key is to find peo­ple at or near the top of orga­ni­za­tions who value crea­tive and stra­te­gic thin­king … the Hugh­train stuff … and who will allow you the con­sul­tant the access, time and open­min­ded­ness to pro­vide insight and question-based value … for appro­xi­ma­tely as much as the basic admin sup­port the com­pany recei­ves. Those clients who honestly do unders­tand how this other or addi­tio­nal pers­pec­tive can be extre­mely valua­ble should be your tar­gets.
    3 or 4 clients at 3,000 per month will keep you in rice, let­tuce and Jager­meis­ter, and keep you out of the rain, I imagine.

  17. Geoff says:

    Hugh I was chat­ting to these peo­ple the other night http://www.cambridgematrix.co.uk/ they may well be inte­res­ted in your ser­vi­ces — con­tact rend at their url

  18. If a com­pany is clued in they won’t need you.
    If they’re clue­less, they won’t want you.
    You need the half-clued.
    And if you’re half good, they’ll be clued-in quick.
    So, yeah raise your fee by half. 15K. Work with no client for no more than three months. 5K per. Clued-in in 90 days or fuck off and die.
    Plus eli­mi­nate the phone calls. NONE! Unless you plan on recor­ding them, for qua­lity or fuc­king ama­ze­ment pur­po­ses.
    Keep it all in text/wikis. Pres­su­res peo­ple to think. Hold all meetings,when and if and only when neces­sary, at a zoo or an art gallery.
    Other than that, I haven’t got a fuc­king clue what you’re tal­king about, to be honest about it, other than unders­tan­ding that peo­ple are basi­cally psycho­tic, so there’s a basis for a con­ver­sa­tion there, I sup­pose, but I really don’t want to have a con­ver­sa­tion about the shit I buy, and I wouldn’t have to if everything thrown on the mar­ket wasn’t beta qua­lity in the first fuc­king place. I’d be fuc­king ama­zed if ever­yone stop­ped pre­su­ming that I want a rela­tionship. I don’t. Any more than I want mes­sa­ges. I want anony­mous sex. No tal­king. It’s always ama­zing and renews my faith in our spe­cies more than any pro­duct and or ser­vice, and if you and the busi­ness model Train set don’t get this, call me and we’ll talk.

  19. Seyed Razavi says:

    Please for­give me: I’m not in mar­ke­ting or the non-technical type of con­sul­tancy. Worse, I have a pretty bad impres­sion of these fields (old-skool and new hips­ter types as well). So my com­ments will no doubt seem stu­pid but that’s never stop­ped me before.
    Firstly, I’d agree that $500 / month is too low. Further­more, I’m scep­ti­cal as to how you can from the outside really change the cul­ture within as someone else poin­ted out.
    Howe­ver, $500 / month doesn’t sound a huge expense for an infor­ma­tion source that could lead to more spe­ci­fic or entrenched con­sul­tancy roles.
    Think of it as pre­mium con­tent gaping­void if you like where you edu­cate the cor­po­rate cul­ture by put­ting in a dia­lo­gue within the com­pany. A lot of these ‘hugh­less’ com­pa­nies have or want an intra­net that goes beyond con­tacts and top-down intra-news.
    You could pro­vide something more valua­ble than just your words of wis­dom, case stu­dies, pro­blems / ans­wers or wha­te­ver other con­tent con­si­de­red use­ful. You can pro­vide a point of inte­rac­tion where the entire cor­po­rate foodchain is invi­ted, encou­ra­ged, cajo­led to inte­ract with each other AND ulti­ma­tely with their cus­to­mers. You can act as cheer­lea­der if they’re get­ting it or pro­blem high­ligh­ter if they’re not.
    This would be a mash-up of pre­mium con­tent by you (and your minions), pri­vate but use­ful play areas / tools (wikis, blogs, forums, wha­te­ver) and public (cus­to­mer facing) areas (group edi­ted blogs?).
    An ASP model for cus­to­mer dia­lo­gue ser­vi­ces if you like… without the bland, face­less cor­po­rate entity they mostly repre­sent and encou­rage.
    I guess if you’re going to change cul­ture you will have to embed your­self within the daily lives of your clients not just give them pep talks. You’ll also have to replace the pro­ces­ses, struc­tu­res and tools that they currently use but fight this evo­lu­tion. You have to really change what CRM means to a com­pany.
    So what my long-winded rant is saying: Don’t just tell they need to con­verse, make them and pro­vide the tools (and pro­ces­ses) they need to do it. Posi­tive rein­for­ce­ment etc.

  20. hugh macleod says:

    Sayed, I totally agree:
    1. $500 is too low. I’m rethin­king to $2-3K. We’ll see.
    2. “Don’t just tell they need to con­verse, make them and pro­vide the tools (and pro­ces­ses) they need to do it. Posi­tive rein­for­ce­ment etc.”
    Agreed. Which is why I’m currently tal­king to a tech com­pany about co-building “deli­ve­ra­bles”.
    You’re right– pep talks aren’t enough ;-)
    I’ve just been kee­ping kinda quiet about the deli­ve­ra­ble side till I’m more ready to go public.
    Thanks =)

  21. “We are here to find mea­ning. We are here to help other peo­ple do the same. Everything else is secon­dary.”
    Hugh, buddy, seriously. If this is the sta­tion from which the Hugh­train departs, I’m for­ced to sug­gest $500 might be a wee bit exor­bi­tant.
    I think you’re swell, really, and it is true that the dipshits and scum­bags that popu­late Cor­po­rate Ame­rica will pay abso­lu­tely ass-puckering quan­ti­ties of cash for anything that gives the sligh­test hint of ‘enhan­cing sha­rehol­der return’ or ‘maxi­mi­zing ROI’ or ‘hel­ping to keep dar­kie down’, and any attempt to hokus­po­kus some lucre out of them is admi­ra­ble, but cri­key!
    “We humans want to believe in our own spe­cies. And we want peo­ple, com­pa­nies and pro­ducts in our lives that make it easier to do so.”
    Well, no. Or maybe maybe.
    How about this, ins­tead? We humans don’t want to die. We don’t even want to think about it. And we want peo­ple, com­pa­nies and pro­ducts in our lives that help us to fool our­sel­ves that we won’t.
    I’m not sure that that’s even true, enti­rely, but it’s as true (well, more so, I rec­kon, of course) as the one you offer.
    And I’m givin’ it away for free, with more where that came from. Hell, took me about 12 seconds to come up with it! All free for the taking, thanks to the every­las­ting good­ness of my chic­keny heart.
    No, wait, 750 Euros a month! That’s the tic­ket. ’cause those cashed-up corner-office bas­tards don’t value anything unless it’s got a fuc­king price tag attached.
    So hop on the Won­derchic­ken Express, kids!
    And help pull my sorry ass out of poverty.

  22. How does bran­ding really hap­pen? (1)

    Among the com­ments on one of Hugh’s posts I found this gem from Ben Whar­ton (who doesn’t seem to have a website)(My emphasis)As someone who has seen the most basic screw-ups occur when outside con­sul­tants, espe­cially in the IT industry,…

  23. Han­ging Skepticism

    What do we know about sto­ries? We know that they are not true…that they are lies. We know this and yet we spend most of our lives lis­te­ning to them. Telling them. Belie­ving them. Why? Because we need them.