December 6, 2004

comment spam

zzzzazzdggg80.jpg
Oh, this is WAY too funny.
I’ve star­ted recie­ving com­ment spam by none other than… wait for it… Blogethics.org.
Heh. That Jason Cala­ca­nis, he’s such a rube.
Go here to see some.
(Car­toon dedi­ca­ted to Laren)
[LINKLUBE:] The newest Advertising-related blog to watch: AdPulp. David Byrne’s a fine wri­ter with some good ideas. Check it out!
[UPDATE:] I just got an e-mail from Jason– I honestly don’t think it was him, but some­body trying to make him look bad. Really, nobody who does blogs that seriously would be that stu­pid.
Any gues­ses? The IP num­ber is 68.120.181.17 if that helps.

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

13 Responses to “comment spam”

  1. David Burn says:

    Hugh,
    I rip on your “Hugh­train Mani­festo” and you still think I’m a good read. Nice. The high road is the road less taken, but the one worth taking, for sure. Thank you for your patience and your plug.
    Btw, I spell it “Burn.” David Byrne is the guy with big suits. I’m sure you suf­fer the same fate with the Mc v. Mac thing.
    _david

  2. David Burn says:

    Hugh,
    I rip on your “Hugh­train Mani­festo” and you still think I’m a good read. Nice. The high road is the road less taken, but the one worth taking, for sure. Thank you for your patience and your plug.
    Btw, I spell it “Burn.” David Byrne is the guy with big suits. I’m bet you suf­fer the same fate with the Mc v. Mac thing.
    _david

  3. Jason says:

    Hugh,
    I’m sorry you got spam­med. It was NOT me… someone is doing this to try and make me look bad.
    I’m sorry you have to deal with this, but these Word of Mouth/BzzAgent folks seem to be willing to do anything to take down anyone who takes them on.
    Idiots.

  4. Dave Balter says:

    Jason -
    You know very well this isn’t us.
    We even tal­ked to you today as we BOTH tried to figure out who was doing this.
    If it was us, why would we call our own busi­nes­ses “evil”?
    I’m all about enga­ging in the debate, but your tac­tics are clearly disin­ge­nuous. Sprea­ding untrue sta­te­ment without facts, in wri­ting, is libel. Be careful.

  5. Jason, you’re about the best per­son at accu­sa­tory gene­ra­li­za­tions that I’ve ever seen/read online. Why assume it’s a WoM/BzzAgent rather than someone else you’ve pissed-off in the last two days?
    Don’t you think it’s a little obvious for WoM crew to actually use THAT topic to emba­rrass you? Espe­cially from an orga­ni­za­tion that you accuse of being sec­re­tive? Sheesh! you’d think we were Free­ma­sons or something.
    Hmmm… FREEMASON has nine let­ters, and so does BZZAGENTS — they must be witches — Burn ‘em!!
    WAIT… CALACANIS also has nine let­ters.
    It’s all a cons­pi­racy.
    …besi­des, the mind con­trol ins­truc­tions from “The Hive” said to use your Sony Boy­cott as the sub­ject of our “Cala­ca­nis Com­ment Spam Cam­paign.” Two more Bzz­Points and I get a toas­ter.
    ~DON
    BzzA­gent tur­ned me into a NEWT…
    but I got better.

  6. Jason says:

    I don’t know it was BzzA­gents… you’re right. That is why I put a ? at the end of my sta­te­ment on my blog. Howe­ver, it is clear that a large group of your agents are very mad at me for poin­ting out the fact that you guys are telling them to lie and be decieve peo­ple.
    I’m get­ting a lot of your BzzA­gents pos­ting insane spam on my blog… very hate­ful stuff.
    My *guess* at this point is that one of your agents is so upset about me calling you guys out for pro­mo­ting lying and decep­tion – as the New York Times did yes­ter­day – that they are willing to do anything to make me look bad. Again, it is my guess that this is one of your agents, but I don’t know that for sure. Howe­ver, I may know who did this very shortly… and that will be a very inte­res­ting moment won’t it?
    best jason

  7. Jason:
    The NY Times article did nothing even remo­tely close to saying BzzA­gent lied or decei­ved. As a mat­ter of fact they cited a spe­ci­fic ins­tance in which an appli­cant elec­ted NOT to join because they felt they couldn’t live up to the ethi­cal stan­dards by which BzzA­gents are asked to abide.
    It appears your rea­ding com­prehen­sion is as poor as your com­prehen­sion of the role of BzzAgent.com and its agents.
    I’m gues­sing you’re recei­ving angry com­ments simply because your approach to cri­ti­ci­zing the company’s busi­ness ideas comes clo­ser to per­so­nally insul­ting the BzzA­gents by accu­sing them of being disin­ge­nuous and calling them liars and decei­vers.
    Nobody likes a per­so­nal attack, Jason… espe­cially when your basis for the claim is nothing so much as your opi­nion, rather than fact or expe­rience.
    Although an argu­ment can be made that since BzzA­gent does not manu­fac­ture or con­trol the buzz their agents relate, that there could be ‘bad apples’ amongst the bunch — but it’s impos­si­ble to con­trol an individual’s actions, and the same ‘bad apple’ argu­ment can be made for any group of peo­ple — doc­tors, law­yers, wai­ters, and… bloggers.

  8. Chris says:

    Cust­Name: Solo Tire Inc
    Address: 268 Bush St. #5000
    City: San Fran­cisco
    Sta­te­Prov: CA
    Pos­tal­Code: 94104
    Country: US
    Reg­Date: 2004-02-07
    Upda­ted: 2004-02-07
    NetRange: 68.120.181.16 — 68.120.181.23

  9. Canuckflack says:

    Blog com­ment spam — not really from Calacanis

    Pro­pa­ga­ting a cam­paign through word of mouth some­ti­mes invol­ves buil­ding volume by having many, many sour­ces repeat basic and ele­men­tary facts — but com­ment spam? “Help stop evil (url snip) word of mouth mar­ke­ters like (url snip) BzzAgent.com by suppor…

  10. Laren says:

    :)
    I love how the word “tits” makes peo­ple come check out my site, pre­su­mably loo­king for mine.

  11. campester says:

    laren -
    guilty as char­ged [hangs head in shame]…
    man, this thread is fun!! this is the kind of cat­fight i surf the web for!! too bad they charge money at f’d com­pany now.
    defi­ni­tely worth the price of admis­sion [not here of course, i’m tal­king about my ISP…]
    although i would gladly subsc­ribe to gaping­void! [but only if i had to.]

  12. Greg Smyth says:

    This Bzz­zA­gents thing… am I mis­sing something subtle and nuan­ced or is it just pro­ducts that aren’t good enough to get word of mouth bri­bing peo­ple to give them fake word of mouth?
    Surely no one would be stu­pid enough to think that’s a new and radi­cal mar­ke­ting con­cept (never­mind a *good* one)…

  13. I like your stuff. Like my cou­sin Ash­leigh Bri­lliant you express the ideas of many of us. Would you check out my little card site? I would like to do something with you. I have prin­ted online lon­ger than iprint.
    Cheers,
    B. Bri­lliant
    for those in need,
    jobcards.com