December 5, 2004

chanel soap grabbing

zzzzazzdggg79.jpg
Well, this is quite funny:
Recently I pan­ned the new Cha­nel No. 5 com­mer­cial:

It was corny, it was clich

9 Responses to “chanel soap grabbing”

  1. boo says:

    Maybe the anony­mous pos­ter is a ran­dom Aus­tra­lian direc­tor. ;)

  2. hugh macleod says:

    Could be. I’m now #2 Goo­gle search for “Cha­nel No 5″.
    Heh.

  3. boo says:

    i agree with you, it was a pile of shit. What made it worse for me, is that when i saw it the first time, it was in the middle of “Mou­lin Rouge”. Which i love, which is a mar­ve­llous film. And i was horri­fied that he had sunk so low as to attempt to repro­duce the same film, at a much lower qua­lity, for a fuc­king com­me­ri­cal!!!!! Let’s just say my esti­ma­tion of Mr Lurh­mann, fell to the hell.

  4. I hate that Cha­nel com­mer­cial too.
    A while ago I cri­ti­ci­zed a Pepto Bis­mol com­mer­cial and I recei­ved a com­ment months later prai­sing the com­mer­cial. When I searched the IP address it tur­ned out the com­ment came from someone at Proc­tor and Gam­ble, the com­pany that owns Pepto Bis­mol. Perhaps your com­ment was from an under­co­ver Cha­nel agent.
    Here is the post:
    http://www.standard-deviance.com/archives/2004/06/23/when-youre-sliding-into-first-and-you-feel-like-youre-gonna-burst/

  5. Hamish says:

    Right.
    The advert suc­ked, and loo­ked like a chop­ped down ver­sion of “Mou­lin Rouge.” Who was I sup­po­sed to be sym­pathe­tic with? The gay guy (or least metro­se­xual) who was trying to be sultry, but just loo­ked like a sulky art stu­dent, or Nicole Kid­man, who was wan­de­ring around in a taxi in a feathe­red night­dress. Wow, that’s an expe­rience I aspire to for me and my belo­ved.
    I mean, who did they want to ins­pire with this, it just loo­ked like a load of cor­po­rate cock tug­ging.
    Also, Cha­nel 5 is a really heavy per­fume, I can­not smell it without thin­king of old ladies. Now, that might pop somebody’s cork, but not mine. (eh, ask me in thirty years and I might feel dif­fe­rently…)
    Now, if they had para­ded Nicole Kid­man butt naked, and then adver­ti­sed something that smelt like her, well, I would buy that, but I guess that’s not what’s on offer…
    Ques­tion of no rele­vance. How much you you pay for the real smell of a famous film star. (Audrey Hep­burn — Pla­yers Navy Cut with a hint of buli­mic vomit, for ins­tance…)
    Hmmm. Time to go and hide in the card­board bomb shel­ter again.

  6. campester says:

    i have a friend who’s a dou­ble agent wor­king behind enemy lines in the PR busi­ness, and he con­firms that a lot of the big dino­saur firms do, in fact, pay peo­ple to scour the inter­net for any and all men­tions, ever, of their pro­duct, even in the most minis­cule, tri­vial, venal set­tings. the sad thing is that some of these emplo­yees may actually spend some of their lunch hour defen­ding their clients in blog com­ments, even though their bos­ses never flat out “asked” them to troll on their behalf.
    oh what a piece of work is man…

  7. Jon Husband says:

    Pretty clear, huh ?
    Either admire it, or ignore it, do not make absurd com­pa­ri­sons bet­ween the world of luxury and the world that is exem­pli­fied by fra­grance you buy from the drug store
    Fit in or fuck off, said with glea­ming white teeth and upper lip pulled back into a disc­reet and char­ming snarl.

  8. Joy says:

    ‘the world of luxury’…Do we need to hold our pinky at a rakish angle while utte­ring those words?