November 30, 2004

horizontal media

zzzzazzdggg48.jpg
Blog-Mogul Nick Den­ton spea­king in The Inde­pen­dant:

“Weblogs are just web­si­tes that hap­pen to be arran­ged in reverse chro­no­lo­gi­cal order,” the 36-year-old Den­ton explains. “They have the cha­rac­te­ris­tics of honesty and humour and they speak to audien­ces at their level, not from on high.”

The phrase “not from on high” got my attet­nion.
Not-from-on-high media, non-hierarchal media.
i.e. non-vertical media,.
i.e. “Hori­zon­tal Media”.
Media that ope­ra­tes on a flat, non-hierarchal plane etc.

5 Responses to “horizontal media”

  1. Paul says:

    (Apo­lo­gies for the repe­ti­tion. I am incompetent.)

  2. Doc Searls says:

    I like “unme­dia­ted media”. Which may be self-cancelling, which is also fine mit moi. I like “media” almost as little as I like “con­tent”. Do you even need media when you’re zero dis­tance from the other party? When you’re together in a place that’s a place because absence of class and dis­tance obviate the need for mediation?

  3. hugh macleod says:

    Ooops. Paul, I think I dele­ted the wrong com­ment by mis­take.… Sorry. Feel free to repost etc.

  4. hugh macleod says:

    Hmmm… I don’t mind the word “media”.… I really don’t like the phrase “The Media”, though.

  5. JoeF says:

    Hori­zon­tal isn’t eactly right, tho. The pla­ying field may have been level 3 or 4 years ago, but these days, brea­king in is nearly impos­si­ble, unless you’ve got something spe­cial about you (spe­cial exper­tise, par­ti­cu­larly bri­lliant wit, what have you). It’s a meri­toc­ricy, which is com­ple­tely fine, but it’s also a bit entrenched. In the poli­ti­cal blogs (the ones I read the most), there’s a dozen or so major sites, and almost no ups­tart is going to break into that group without pulling off a minor miracle.