November 26, 2004

scobleized

zzzmkghilkj38.jpg
One of my favo­rite blogs is Steve Hall’s Adrants. Which explains why I’ve had a blo­gad run­ning there for the last year or so.
Every month it dri­ves a cou­ple of hun­dred, some­ti­mes thou­sands of ad-folk to gaping­void. After a year of this, it’s adding up. A lot of peo­ple in the ad biz know my work now. Not bad, not bad at all.
One of the perks of Adrants is that it spots new, whacko trends in the adver­ti­sing world just about soo­ner than anyone. It’s a good place to get the early word.
Some­body deci­des tat­tooing ads on people’s sha­ved heads in exchange for cash is “the hot new medium”, Steve will write about it.
If Paris Hil­ton ever gets around to ren­ting her upper-inner thigh out as a bill­board (no, it wouldn’t sur­prise me), Steve will write about it.
Rock on.
Having spent a good por­tion of my early career in has-been, stuffy, con­ser­va­tive agen­cies, I’ve done my fair share of fan­ta­si­sing about what I’d do if the has-been, stuffy con­ser­va­tive client ever got around to let­ting the team and I come up with anarchic, crazy, cutting-edge stunts, the kind Steve wri­tes about so well.
Of course, it never hap­pe­ned.
But maybe that’s a good thing. The older I get, the less these crazy stunts seem like career-building exer­ci­ses, and the more they just seem like “re-arranging deckchairs on the Tita­nic”.
I think the game has moved on.
Here’s an exam­ple. Ask me to name what I think is the most bri­lliant piece of new adver­ti­sing I’ve come across in the last 5 years.
My ans­wer would not be some big, funky-dunky cam­paign from a com­pany like Apple or Volks­wa­gon.
My ans­wer would not be something from some edgy, hips­ter, in-your-face crea­tive hot-shop in down­town Manhat­tan or Lon­don.
My ans­wer would be Robert Sco­ble, a regu­lar guy with a regu­lar job who blogs regu­larly about the com­pany he works for. That com­pany hap­pens to be Mic­ro­soft.
I seriously believe Robert, on Microsoft’s behalf, is making more adver­ti­sing his­tory at this very moment than all the crea­tive hot-shops com­bi­ned. He is chan­ging the game beyond all recog­ni­tion. The hot-shops are not.
And he’s pro­bably doing it at less than 1% of the price the con­ven­tio­nal agen­cies are used to char­ging.
So if you find your­self wor­king in adver­ti­sing, you now have two choi­ces:
1. Try to prove folks like me wrong or
2. Get with the pro­gram.
A lot of peo­ple will opt for Choice Num­ber 1. A lot of them will lose everything.

5 Responses to “scobleized”

  1. Jon Husband says:

    I think you’re right.
    But then there’s those damn New York-like “who-knows-who’s” that you’ll have to sell such a new idea to.

  2. Per Eriksson says:

    You are 100% Right!! When Sco­ble can sell me Mic­ro­soft and he has, I for one know he is doing things right. He is the best adver­ti­sing Mic­ro­soft ever had.

  3. You guys make me blush. Thanks!

  4. Rich...! says:

    The blog­ger in me couldn’t agree more. Howe­ver I don’t thing Scobe is enough just yet. Some­ti­mes those of us that blog, and are influen­ced by blogs, for­get that we are still a teeny weeny pim­ple on the ass of the world. I find my self quo­ting Sco­ble, Doc­to­row, and even Mac­Leod to peo­ple, and am sur­pri­sed when I get just blank sta­res in return.
    Mic­ro­soft is a soft­ware pro­du­cer for the mas­ses, thus pro­bably still requi­res mar­ke­ting for the masses…!

  5. hugh macleod says:

    Point taken, Rich.
    But it’s early days yet…
    The Clue­train has left the sta­tion. It may not have arri­ved at its des­ti­na­tion yet, but… maybe there’s no des­ti­na­tion to arrive at. It’s just an ongoing, frac­tal, orga­nic proc­cess.
    The genie’s already out of the bottle. Peo­ple who try to put him back in are just going to cause them­sel­ves more grief.
    And sure, I get plenty of blank sta­res back at me as well. Their loss.