November 21, 2004

linklube: john husband’s wirearchy

zzzzzz7654140.jpg
Just added a new name to my blo­groll: Jon Husband’s “Wirearchy”.
Been mea­ning to add him for a while. His whole “Social Archi­tec­ture For The Wired World” sch­tick I find abso­lu­tely fas­ci­na­ting. Stuff like this:

…This was follo­wed by a quaint social and not-quite-commercial phe­no­me­non called the dot.com boom.…
…But it wasn’t quite the right mix of ideas and capa­bi­li­ties yet … the socio­logy hadn’t yet caught up to the pos­si­bi­li­ties that see­med clear and acces­si­ble. Thus, there was a dot.com bust.
And the old fogeys who were the pro­prie­tors and the cus­to­dians of the for­tres­ses wiped their brows, saying “whew, that was close” … and crac­ked the whip. Back to busy­ness, every­body … and don’t get any smart ideas like that again … you’re here to work for us.

The “So tell me…” car­toon above is there for a rea­son. Sure, I would say that me and a large per­cen­tage of my rea­ders are peo­ple who get more exci­ted than most about “The New Rea­li­ties”. Hence why rea­ding stuff from peo­ple like Jon or Doc or Jeff or Mary is such a treat for us.
Yet as a for­mer New Yor­ker, I know that in spite of all these chan­ges, a lot of old social hie­rarchies will remain. Metapho­ri­cally, we’ll still have to kiss the maitre-d’s ass to get a decent table. Metapho­ri­cally, we’ll still have to wear Rolex watches in order to get the girl to go home with us. Metapho­ri­cally, we’ll still have to pro­si­tute our­sel­ves on Madi­son Ave­nue in order to pay for the co-op on East 61st.
The Big New York Ques­tion, “What can you do for me?” isn’t going anywhere. Heh.

8 Responses to “linklube: john husband’s wirearchy”

  1. Colleen says:

    “Yet as a for­mer New Yor­ker, I know that in spite of all these chan­ges, a lot of old social hie­rarchies will remain. Metapho­ri­cally, we’ll still have to kiss the maitre-d’s ass to get a decent table. Metapho­ri­cally, we’ll still have to wear Rolex watches in order to get the girl to go home with us. Metapho­ri­cally, we’ll still have to pro­si­tute our­sel­ves on Madi­son Ave­nue in order to pay for the co-op on East 61st.”
    Yes, yes, assu­ming these things still have value for us. But if we start roc­king the little Argen­ti­nean joint around the cor­ner or dig­ging on the chick who doesn’t care f**k-all for what we wear/drive/own or living somewhere else, ima­gine the pos­si­bi­li­ties.
    As one who took ten. full. years. to dis­pose of her book & reel, I truly believe you can­not grab on to something new when you’re hol­ding on tight to something old.
    I mean, I like a fine, single-malt scotch as much as the next girl but that’s what Tra­der Joe’s is for.

  2. bmo says:

    Yeah, like Colleen said. And jump before they kick you off. The balance beam’s a razor anyway.

  3. nickbaum says:

    Wow. I’ve been loo­king for that car­toon I’d want on my blog­cards, and I think this is it.
    Any chance you’re adding some new designs in the future?
    –Nick

  4. Second on the blog­card! I’ll order this one on the spot.
    I’m with Colleen. So what about the old order –they can keep their mai­tre d’. There’s a para­llel uni­verse and it’s big enough to get lost in and play in and create in and it’s more fun to boot.

  5. Jon Husband says:

    Thanks for the men­tion, Hugh.
    “They” aren’t sen­ding out crews to take down the ‘Net (yet), and it seems obvious to me that lots of smart and enga­ged peo­ple con­nec­ted to each other are crea­ting new path­ways for con­nec­tion, and for get­ting things done.
    Yes, hie­rarchies aren’t going anywhere either, but these new ways are crea­ting some pres­su­res. As Ming the Mecha­nic dis­plays pro­mi­nently on the hea­der of his blog … “An old rigid civi­li­za­tion is reluc­tantly dying. Something new, open and free is waking up”.

  6. hugh macleod says:

    “Open and free” is often a euphe­mism for “Holy Crap, I am really poor!” ;-)

  7. nick s says:

    “Metapho­ri­cally, we’ll still have to kiss the maitre-d’s ass to get a decent table.”
    lol made me imme­dia­tely think of the sce­nes from Ferris Bueller’s Day Off where he’s paying the garage guy a “5 spot” to take good care of the clas­sic Ferrari, and then goes on to the ritzy res­tau­rant and plays his way into a res­pec­ted table from the maitr-d there.
    Con­cer­ning the car­toon — maybe I’m mee­ting the wrong peo­ple, but it seems they should be lying to me, as they tend to be as boring as they come. make me laugh, make me want to hear more, make me something! make me want to stay and talk a little lon­ger! As it is, I’d rather hurry off the train and get to some mind num­bing work already…bad sign methinks…

  8. Jon Husband says:

    “Open and free” is often a euphe­mism for “Holy Crap, I am really poor!”
    Indeed … he
    And then there’s timing … as always. We all work way too frea­kin’ hard some­ti­mes to figure “it” out. I’ve always found it inte­res­ting that some com­pa­nies and peo­ple have made out really well wrap­ping know­ledge and ser­vice, etc. around open source … and I sus­pect the jury’s still out about music.
    Any­way, we can’t ignore the “who knows who”, and we also can’t ignore the “who knows what and is lin­ked”. As Doc is fond of saying, seems like one of those “both/and” things.