November 21, 2004

british parties

zzzzazzdggg60.jpg
[PART ONE:]
When I left college in Lon­don in the late 1980s, Mar­ga­ret Thatcher was still the Prime Minis­ter, and at the height of her powers. The Thatche­rite Revo­lu­tion was in full swing, and the chan­ges she was making to the Bri­tish social fabric would be even more pro­found than the ones Rea­gan was making to the US equi­va­lent.
One name you asso­ciate a lot with that era is “Saatchi & Saatchi”. They were the lar­gest Bri­tish ad agency at the time. They did the adver­ti­sing for the Thatcher’s Con­ser­va­tive Party, Bri­tish Air­ways, Mars etc and boy, were they good at what they did. Since then their star has faded, but hey, things change.
My point is, back when I ente­red the job mar­ket, Bri­tish adver­ti­sing was synony­mous with social change. You wan­ted insight about where the country, the eco­nomy, the world etc was hea­ding, asking someone in adver­ti­sing was as good a way to do it as any.
That, of course, is no lon­ger the case. From Natio­nal Rege­ne­ra­tion to “Love Marks” in less than 2 deca­des. How sad.
We are no lon­ger the rock stars. We are no lon­ger the figh­ter pilots. We are no lon­ger the crack troops, figh­ting for a bet­ter and sexier tomo­rrow.
We are a bunch of slobs with an expen­sive pro­duct that gets less use­ful and inte­res­ting by the day.
What to do about it? Sure, I have some ideas. So do some other folk. But they are mostly igno­red by our for­mer rock-star-fighter-pilot collea­gues. They don’t want to change what they’re doing. They just want what they’re doing to mira­cu­lously start beco­ming more valua­ble again, not less.
They just want it to be 1989 again. Not unlike the Grande Dame of Bri­tish retail, Marks & Spencer’s. Good luck to them, they’ll need it.
[PART 2:]
At Bri­tish house par­ties it’s cus­to­mary to bring a bottle of booze along and give it to the hos­tess. Sure, the host and hos­tess will supply a few bott­les and the munchies, but everyone’s expec­ted to somehow add value to the equa­tion.
[PART 3:]
Last Spring Joi Ito came to Lon­don, so some Bri­tish blog­gers got together and orga­ni­sed a blog din­ner for him. I was there. Sure, the lovely Suw Char­man did most of the organising/work, and Joi pro­vi­ded the rai­son d’etre to throw the party, but it was never “Joi’s Party” or “Suw’s Party”. It was everybody’s party, Joi and Suw were just two of the peo­ple who sho­wed up that eve­ning. When the bill came we all pitched in our 

5 Responses to “british parties”

  1. But if it’s an adver­ti­sing party, then no-one brings booze, it’s funny white pow­der.
    Ahem.
    Cough.
    I’ll get me coat.

  2. bmo says:

    In Canada, the beer busi­ness was built by beer reps. Guys — usually for­mer ath­le­tes — who went into bars paid for rounds and told sto­ries of their glory days. In the 80s beer was huge. Then follo­wed the bud­gets and the ads. There was a spike and then boom. Flat­ness. The beer com­pa­nies hired the T-totallers to run their busi­ness. The dec­line. Beer com­pa­nies can­not sell their beer today. No won­der.
    So yeah, take the ad bud­gets, hire fifty beer reps and get them back out there into the bars telling sto­ries.
    Metapho­ri­cally.
    It’s the plight of busi­ness really. Not just adver­ti­sing. Com­mu­ni­ca­tions com­pa­nies being run by the uncom­mu­ni­ca­tive. Pro sports lea­gues being run by non fans of the game. It’s the uni­ver­sal flaw in the coming demise (and rege­ne­ra­tion) of business.

  3. basil says:

    what ama­zes me is how adver­ti­sing which is the front line of “effi­cient” cut throat capi­ta­lism
    is so full of these slobs and para­si­tes
    but then is’nt that what capa­ta­lism is all about :capi­ta­li­sing off other peo­ples efforts to further one’s own gains.
    and let’s be honest that is the only thing that moti­va­tes peo­ple to scale the treache­rous cor­po­rate hie­rarchy is
    to par­take in management’s pero­ga­tive of being cock­suc­kers and unac­coun­ta­ble slac­kers fee­ding off subor­di­na­tes hard work
    love your work hugh
    truly an insight into a repul­sive industry
    also if it’s an adver­ti­sing party the booze
    is throw on free by bre­we­ries hoping
    to drive down their last design fee
    in fact why don’t those bre­we­ries
    rather send in burn out over the hill crea­tive direc­tors desig­ners and copyw­ri­ters
    to regale the bar patrons of the great old time’s they had being alchoho­lics
    for some honest brand insight
    after years of expe­rience
    haha

  4. campester says:

    with my crowd for some time now it hasn’t been booze we bring to the party — it’s been a nice, bul­ging, aro­ma­tic bag of freshly roas­ted ara­bian mocha sanani beans. and after a few stea­ming vol­ca­nic press-pots full, every­body rants all night long, eyes bul­ging out, until the wee hours. kind of like the cof­feehou­ses in which the ame­ri­can revo­lu­tion was fomen­ted, or the situa­tio­nists in 68.
    alcohol slurs speech, so if you’re in the words busi­ness, it’s not a “social lubri­cant” so much as it’s like put­ting salad oil under your car tires. peo­ple i work with clo­sely use it to kill the pain or as a slee­ping aid. some­ti­mes when you’re in the field you can ste­ri­lize medi­cal ins­tru­ments with it.
    but i’m happy to let the older guys drink as much as they want. it makes it easier to cosh them in the alley for their wallets.
    what’s the worst thing that can hap­pen if you trade being a caf­feine freak for being a booze hound? you can perhaps say too much. we the­re­fore do a lot of editing.

  5. sirshannon says:

    I just wan­ted to let you know that the blog­cards I orde­red sur­pas­sed expec­ta­tions in every cate­gory, from the paper stock to the quantity.