November 5, 2004

dinosaurspeak

zzzzazzdggg72.jpg
Gaping­void is the per­fect web­site to get your daily blog­ging fix. Filled to the brim with hila­rious car­toons, it also offers timely and insight­ful com­men­tary on the new rea­li­ties of adver­ti­sing and mar­ke­ting. Indeed, some peo­ple would say it’s just not the blo­gosphere without gaping­void to enhance their qua­lity blog­ging expe­rience. Start your day the switched on way– subsc­ribe here to get gaping­void on your RSS fee­der today!
I wrote the pre­ce­ding para­graph to illus­trate the inte­llec­tual ban­kruptcy of what I call “Dino­saurs­peak”. That rather socio­pathic com­bi­na­tion of being com­ple­tely focu­sed on cus­to­mer bene­fit and yet com­ple­tely sel­fish at the same time.
And yeah, if it doesn’t work on gaping­void, it ain’t going to work on your pro­duct, either.
What is inte­res­ting to me is that this style of lan­guage was pretty uni­ver­sal only a few years ago. Sure, you had a few mave­ricks out there sti­rring things up, but most exter­nal busi­ness com­mu­ni­ca­tion was pretty much stuck in firehose mode.
When mar­kets become smar­ter and fas­ter than the com­pa­nies ser­vi­cing said mar­kets, lan­guage chan­ges. Of course it does.
My ques­tion isn’t “how is it chan­ging” (I already kinda-sorta know the ans­wer to that one), but “why isn’t it chan­ging fas­ter?”
Any thoughts?

30 Responses to “dinosaurspeak”

  1. Jeremy Firth says:

    I know a guy who is a good exam­ple. I used to work for him, he was the mar­ke­ting direc­tor of the com­pany where I wor­ked, and he was con­vin­ced that a good sales let­ter was one that con­tai­ned lots of sta­tis­tics, was devoid of first per­son and had a rea­ding level of at least 11th grade. Pro­blem was, our mar­ket was fire­figh­ters and poli­ce­men. I told him over and over that they don’t read his let­ters, but his ego was so ena­mo­red by how many sta­tis­tics he could quote, that he thought it actually was per­sua­ding someone. Dino­saur, indeed.

  2. john says:

    Demi Moore’s law in action. The ada­po­tion of new tech­no­logy in adver­ti­sing (in this case, language)is not moving as fast as the actual tech­no­logy ( con­ver­sa­tio­nal speech). If I remem­ber correctly Bhas­kar Cha­kra­vorti says the intrin­sic bene­fit to get­tign real is huge. The lag can only come from withol­ders — that is, peo­ple who have har­de­ned around what is fami­liar.
    Watch them change, or watch them die.

  3. Wow. I must subsc­ribe now!

  4. Firas says:

    Er. Don’t be so Soc­ra­tic :) Tell us how that ad would read in the new mar­ket speak. More down to earth? More trans­pa­rent about the rela­tionship bet­ween the con­su­mer and pro­du­cer and less focu­sed on trying to make it seem that it’s the best thing that ever hap­pe­ned to the consumer?

  5. Here’s one rea­son why dinosaur-speak con­ti­nues to exist:
    Lazy jour­na­lists often copy dinosaur-speak directly from our press relea­ses into artic­les. The text ins­tantly goes from being unbe­lie­va­ble hype from a bia­sed source — to being the exci­ted view of a wise and impar­tial jour­na­list.
    The jour­na­list could ring up our CEO to try to get quo­tes that aren’t in dinosaur-speak, but frankly it’s a lot easier for them to just copy the quo­tes and ques­tio­na­ble asser­tions directly from our press release into the article. Our CEO is now fluent in dinosaur-speak, thanks to the trai­ning our PR peo­ple kindly arran­ged for all our senior mana­ge­ment team.
    A jour­na­list could spend time chec­king the cre­di­bi­lity of our sta­te­ments, but then the press release might prove not to be news­worthy, and how the hell DO you find 100 pages of news every week for an industry maga­zine cove­ring an industry where nothing of inte­rest hap­pens? The ‘jour­na­lists’ turn a blind eye to the dinosaur-speak; we feed them hype to fill their pages.
    If you’re a $30k pa ‘jour­na­list’, are you really going to want to rip into com­pa­nies whose PR peo­ple source 70 per cent of your sto­ries, get anec­do­tes for your artic­les, take you to lunch and give you free­bies ‘to review’? If you do, they’re stop helping/bribing you.
    Senior mana­ge­ment are deligh­ted to see their dinosaur-speak in the industry mags, the PR peo­ple are deligh­ted to craft the dinosaur-speak for $100,000pa for 12 days work, and the jour­na­lists are happy to have PR com­pa­nies do most of their work for them.
    Here’s to dinosaur-speak, and the fools who believe it!

  6. John says:

    I guess the bott­lenck isnt just the dumb old adver­si­ting men though. Its also in many cases the adver­ti­seing con­su­mer. Its comfy being tal­ked to in this old Kraft and Kellogs lan­guage. Not just as a kind of nos­tal­gia: Tide ads and other per­pe­tua­tors of dino­saur speak pro­mise a world that is a kin­der gent­ler place than it actually is, and ever was. That is, if you act/subscribe now.

  7. coco church says:

    Thanks for the com­ment! These car­toons are great! I’ve added you to my blo­groll, so i can keep up with your antics and dra­wings:) They’re great.

  8. Tom says:

    Yeah, I have thoughts, but your blood HTML is broken.

  9. Tom says:

    Yeah, I have thoughts, but your bloody HTML is broken.

  10. Tom says:

    OK, so, rea­ding that first para­graph was really scary. Then, I saw that you were inten­ding it to be really scary, and it was OK.
    So, that’s what I was tal­king about when I wrote this: http://truetalk.typepad.com/truetalk/2004/11/revisiting_clue_1.html
    Stay loose, Paris will even­tually be great. It’s very cou­ra­geous of you to write about it not being exactly what you expected.

  11. Dinosaur-speak.. spot on. There’s something so sou­lless, lea­den and bland about it. I think it’s part of a cul­ture in which the copy isn’t really writ­ten to satisfy the end-customer, just to flat­ter the client. And part of a cul­ture in which “customer-centricity” is just another of those exci­ting ideas that eve­yone talks about without really doing the work.

  12. Raymond Tse says:

    Your track­back link is bro­ken — so I’ll com­ment.
    Great post — I lin­ked to yours at http://kinetic-energy.blogspot.com/2004/11/dinosaurspeak.html
    Howe­ver I just rea­li­sed that this sort of dino­saurs­peak is alive and well in the work­place. How many of your fellow work­ma­tes (inc­lu­ding your­self) put on a dif­fe­rent tone and lan­guage when spea­king to senior mana­ge­ment. Sud­denly ins­tead of being straight tal­king with firm views on the cor­po­rate issues of the day — we find our­sel­ves in full appro­val and suck up mode.

  13. hugh macleod says:

    “Tell us how that ad would read in the new mar­ket speak.”
    Easy ans­wer, Firas. Read my blog every day and find out.
    Every blog entry is an ad for gaping­void. Of course it is. ;-)

  14. hugh macleod says:

    “Tell us how that ad would read in the new mar­ket speak.”
    Easy ans­wer, Firas. Read my blog every day and find out.
    Every blog entry is an ad for gaping­void. Of course it is. ;-)

  15. Nia says:

    Now, the opi­nion on someone who has abso­lu­tely no clue about adver­ti­sing…
    That first para­graph feels like the writ­ten part in a soy­milk ad. It’s so irri­ta­ting it makes me feel like boy­cot­ting that brand and the maga­zine where I found the ad. Then I go to the super­mar­ket and buy the chea­pest or the least-known brand, thin­king that the dif­fe­rence in price is due to the expen­sive brand spen­ding more money in mar­ke­ting. I don’t want to buy a label, I just want to buy the milk.
    I guess not ever­yone in the super­mar­ket thinks like me, but I wish they did.

  16. aleah says:

    All ad copy is mas­tur­ba­tory. :-)
    Seriously though, I would say the dinosaur’s are han­ging on because they aren’t pas­sio­nate about the art of mar­ke­ting or sales. It’s one part lazi­ness, one part apathy. Plus, those exc­la­ma­tion marks and cliches still work to var­ying degrees and accor­ding to the product.

  17. aleah says:

    All ad copy is mas­tur­ba­tory. :-)
    Seriously though, I would say the dinosaur’s are han­ging on because they aren’t pas­sio­nate about the art of mar­ke­ting or sales. It’s one part lazi­ness, one part apathy. Plus, those exc­la­ma­tion marks and clich

  18. aleah says:

    Yikes, sorry about the dou­ble posting.

  19. Hugh asks: “Why isn’t it chan­ging fas­ter?”
    Jeremy says: “I

  20. Jeremy Heigh says:

    Evelyn, I totally agree. Got any ideas on how to get the party star­ted? How about you, Hugh?

  21. jbr says:

    I think the ans­wer is rela­ti­vely sim­ple — it’s Pav­lo­vian. The tra­di­tio­nal mar­ke­ting “dogs” are not being rewar­ded for a beha­vior change. Regard­less of the blogdom’s insight into the new mar­ket, until there is a sti­mu­lus that for­ces an action that is rein­for­ced by a reward, it will con­ti­nue to be slow going.
    So, until the mar­ket demands a real con­ver­sa­tion by igno­ring the current language/approach, the lands­cape will con­ti­nue to be domi­na­ted by the lan­guage of the dino (dinoese?).
    Likely, this is too sim­ple of an expla­na­tion, but it seems easier to unders­tand. So, our job is to con­ti­nue to edu­cate and infil­trate the mind of the mar­ket in order to create the stimulus/reward mecha­nism that will acce­le­rate the change.

  22. jbr says:

    By the way, Hugh. After rea­ding your “How to be crea­tive” mani­festo, I deci­ded to do something mea­ning­ful with chan­ging the world. My blog, http://bigchieftablet.blogspot.com/ is a very nas­cent attempt to create a clea­ringhouse for the thou­sands of con­ver­sa­tions that occur each day about poor pro­duct per­for­mance or poor cus­to­mer ser­vice expe­rien­ces. These blog con­ver­sa­tions are lar­gely unheard by the peo­ple who need to hear them the most — the com­pa­nies that sell the pro­ducts and ser­vi­ces.
    My blog is inten­ded to find and publish these com­ments. Hope­fully, as more and more expe­rien­ces are published, the offen­ding com­pa­nies will begin to take notice of the site and use the site as a place to hear the most impor­tant com­ments they will ever get from a cus­to­mer — com­plaints.
    Of course, any com­pany that really unders­tands the blog­dom can do the same thing, but at this time, it’s unli­kely they are thin­king about this ave­nue.
    So, give a brother some props and throw me onto your lin­klube. Trying to change the world without help is a bit of a cha­llenge. Even a wolf hunts in a pack when food is scarce.

  23. campester says:

    why isn’t it chan­ging fas­ter??
    well, to extend your metaphor, maybe we need to gene­rate some kind of mas­sive extinc­tion event…
    here’s a fun mind game for you to play with.
    ima­gine what would hap­pen to the world of adver­ti­sing, mass media, or wha­te­ver, if some science fic­tiony elec­tro­mag­ne­tic pulse wea­pon DESTROYED THE INTERNET AND ALL COMPUTERS. let’s not say “per­ma­nently” right off, although that might as well be the case for all intents and pur­po­ses.
    what forms of com­mu­ni­ca­tion would sur­vive, and which ones would die?
    i pro­pose that bullshit is a reli­gion. sorry; bullshit is a religion™ — ©2004 cam­pes­ter all rights reser­ved.
    sadly, though this new brand i just pulled out of my ass is amu­sing, it doesn’t help much…does it?
    my disease is i keep coming up with these things even though i could make a lot more money by wri­ting that top para­graph over and over and over.

  24. Hugh: For­got to men­tion I thought you were serious for a bit as I was rea­ding and in my mind thin­king ‘what the F*’ is in the food or water in Paris. I should men­tion I was sleep depri­ved.
    Jeremy: I guess that was slightly self-serving remark — although only slightly because my idea isn’t self-serving. What Mas­low desc­ri­bes as a high-synergy-culture and I just heard David Brin call a trans­pa­rent com­pany.
    I’m wor­king on something right now. I’ve star­ted lea­king details on my blog — although my brain is WAY way way ahead of what I’ve actually writ­ten.
    I think today’s post, The Age of Story-Dwelling, has all the rele­vant pos­ted links to my start-up idea thus far:
    http://evelynrodriguez.typepad.com/crossroads_dispatches/2004/11/the_pace_of_the_2.html

  25. Tony Goodson says:

    “why isn’t it chan­ging fas­ter?”
    Why did half of Ame­rica vote for Bush?
    Go figure!
    There’s half your audience for “Dino­saurs­peak”, and if you add the 2 – 16 year olds and the insane, who also didn’t vote for Bush, that’s 75% of the big­gest con­su­mer mar­ket, plus parts of the rest of the world that think that anything Ame­ri­can is cool.
    I keep snig­ge­ring at an advert to buy a Pepsi and win an eve­ning with Beyonce. I wouldn’t want an eve­ning with Beyonce for all the Pepsi in the world!!

  26. Matt says:

    Your first para­graph has not con­vin­ced me to subsc­ribe to your feed (fan­tas­tic site, BTW). Howe­ver, I am com­pe­lled to purchase con­tact len­ses now…if only I could decide on a brand.

  27. J.W.B. says:

    I guess the bott­lenck isnt just the dumb old adver­si­ting men though. Its also in many cases the adver­ti­seing con­su­mer. Its comfy being tal­ked to in this old Kraft and Kellogs lan­guage. Not just as a kind of nos­tal­gia: Tide ads and other per­pe­tua­tors of dino­saur speak pro­mise a world that is a kin­der gent­ler place than it actually is, and ever was. That is, if you act/subscribe now.
    http://domai.host.sk

  28. The new world of mar­ke­ting, part 94

    Com­pare and con­trast, this­just a friendly mid day remin­der never to rent from this man, allan gero­vitz. rudest. bro­ker. ever. we’ve taken our search to fifth ave in park slope and left this chump behind. chump!and this:Fondly called “the maven…

  29. AdPulp says:

    Outs­tan­ding Mis­sion Sta­te­ments: Ninth In A Series

    I unders­tand this is not a mis­sion sta­te­ment, but it could be. The man who wrote it is full of such thoughts, so narro­wing him down to one mis­sion sta­te­ment could be a lot to ask. Not that I have…