Archive for October, 2004

October 15, 2004

egofriction idea

xxx03.jpg
Ego­fric­tion:

random notes

zzzzhbhbhbhb02.jpg
: William Gib­son is blog­ging again. My friend Hamish will be well plea­sed. Thanks to Joi for the tip.
: Nick Den­ton, pro­bably the most suc­cess­ful (and famous) com­mer­cial blog publisher inter­vie­wed in the Wall Street Jour­nal. Tal­king about how blogs are a great mains­tream adver­ti­sing medium (something I con­cur with). Thanks to Bru­ner for the tip. The link to this article is set to expire in five days (WSJ.com is a paid subsc­rip­tion site), so read it while you can.
: “Suc­cess in the Crea­tive Age: The Inter­net, Not TV, Is The Har­bin­ger of the Future.” Evelyn rocks yet again.

1. The psycho­lo­gi­cal cen­ter of gra­vity (+/- 5 years of the adult median age) is ske­wing towards older, more mature mind­set. Sorry, to have to say this so bluntly but the Donald Trumps are stuck in Erik Erikson’s stag­na­tion stage. Trump was the last gene­ra­tion. The lea­ders of the future will be gene­ra­tive. Even Gen Y is exhi­bi­ting more tra­di­tio­nally mature values (btw, I get some ideas about youth sent my way from a rela­tive that works on tween and teen mar­ket research).

: “We pay our law­yers $250 an hour to tell the world that we’re utterly clue­less.“

Paci­fic Research Ins­ti­tute (PRI) wel­co­mes links to its Web site. Howe­ver, before adding a link, you must obtain express writ­ten appro­val from PRI. To seek appro­val for such a link, please fill out the form below and click the sub­mit but­ton at the bot­tom of this form. You will be noti­fied by e-mail if you are gran­ted appro­val to link to pacificresearch.org.
By esta­blishing a link to the PRI Web site, you are dee­med to have agreed to the Link Conditions.

Heck, I’ll tell the world for free. Thanks to Mary Hod­der for the tip.
: From Wired: The Long Tail:

For­get squee­zing millions from a few megahits at the top of the charts. The future of enter­tain­ment is in the millions of niche mar­kets at the sha­llow end of the bitstream.

Thanks to Tim Oren for the tip.
: “Mommy, how come Daddy lost his sorry-ass job in Big Media?“
image12345736.jpg
From David Sifry:

The chart above shows a graph of the most influen­tial or autho­ri­ta­tive blogs as com­pa­red with the most authoritative

why i’m writing a book

zzzbambam31.jpg
I’m wri­ting a book. It’s an expan­sion on a web post I published this sum­mer called “How To Be Crea­tive”.
(NB: The Book Out­line is here)
The pre­mise is very sim­ple:

“So you want to be more crea­tive, in art, in busi­ness, wha­te­ver. Here are some tips that have wor­ked for me over the years.”

I didn

October 14, 2004

egofriction: culture vs technology

aaaaaaaa02.jpg
I’m seeing a huge gap in the mar­ket at the moment.
Com­pa­nies change inter­nally for two main rea­sons. Let’s call them “Cul­ture” and “Tech­no­logy”.
Yes, both affect the other.
My expe­rience has been: if you’re part of the change pro­cess in a com­pany, you’re either a “Cul­tu­ra­list” or a “Tech­no­lo­gist”.
My expe­rience has also been, the Cul­tu­ra­lists and the Tech­no­lo­gists are very bad at tal­king to one another.
So you get “we need a new ad cam­paign” or ” we need a new tech imple­men­ta­tion”. But you never seem to get both at the same time, coming from the same place.
Why is this so? Ego­fric­tion, of course.
Sure, “Ego­fric­tion” is a silly, made-up word. But its era­di­ca­tion will mean big bucks to any­body who gets good at killing it.
I have a few ideas. You?
[UPDATE:] Heh. Gary Max­well in the com­ments puts it nicely:

Mer­ging two cul­tu­res and two tech­no­lo­gies typi­cally fail because each side seems to have a sub­cons­cious desire to have their cul­ture and tech­no­logy “win”. This is never admit­ted by either side, yet it is obvious that each side obfus­ca­tes its inte­llec­tual and cul­tu­ral assets to pre­vent the other side from incor­po­ra­ting them. It reminds me of a biza­rre courtship ritual that never consummates.

ferment

zzzzzz7654127.jpg

untitled

image12345733.jpg

book thoughts

zzzzazzdggg80.jpg
Heard recently from a publishing insi­der that the ave­rage book is lucky to sell 6,000 copies.
That num­ber struck a chord with me– 6000 is about how many uni­que visi­tors I get at gaping­void every day. Some­ti­mes more, some­ti­mes less etc.
Sure, you get money from a book, but to make it also costs you two years of your life. I guess I con­cur with Cor­mac McCarthy’s advice to young wri­ters: “Don’t write unless you have to.“
I’ve been neglec­ting the book recently, but I’m star­ting to think about it some more…
[UPDATE:] Ear­lier I men­tio­ned something about wan­ting to move to Sili­con Valley and join The Revo­lu­tion. Since then I’ve star­ted wor­king with some folk out there. Cool work, too. No need to move there yet, though. I’m still ena­mo­red with my cyber­cafe model.
Mar­kets are con­ver­sa­tions. Mar­kets are con­ver­sa­tions. Who you talk to deci­des what food you put on the table…
CAVEAT: After you reach a cer­tain size the “con­ver­sa­tion” stops beha­ving like a thing and starts beha­ving like a metaphor.

October 13, 2004

talent = scarcity

zzzzzz7654126.jpg
Post-commodity eco­no­mics, Baby!
This car­toon was recently part of a very inte­res­ting Power­point pre­sen­ta­tion. I guess those who were there will recog­nise it.

cybercafe biz models

zzzmkghilkj12.jpg
I’m at the age where folks start con­si­de­ring quit­ting their nine-to-five adver­ti­sing jobs and ope­ning up their own agen­cies.
The thing is, the more I think about it, the less I think you need all that agency crap– offi­ces, emplo­yees, pho­to­co­piers etc etc.
I’m star­ting to think you can do a lot of it from a cyber­cafe, if you have to. How very post-Cluetrain, “Marketing-is-Dead” of me.
This says one of two things: either I’m utterly crazy or the stan­dard agency biz model is truly dead, cold and buried.
Maybe a bit of both…

work family

zzzzzz7654125.jpg

October 12, 2004

misguided belief

zzzzzz7654124.jpg

October 11, 2004

egofriction death squads

zzzhhhccc02.jpg
Ego­fric­tion.
In The Hugh­train there is the oft-quoted thought that the future of adver­ti­sing is “inter­nal”.
i.e. How you talk to each other is more impor­tant than how you talk to the outside world.
i.e. If you can’t dis­cuss with your peo­ple why your pro­duct is fabu­lous, how do expect to be able to do like­wise with the gene­ral public? Exactly. You can’t.
And let’s say you build Bill and Ben The Com­pany Men the most advan­ced inter­nal cor­po­rate com­mu­ni­ca­tions sys­tem in the world. So they can share infor­ma­tion and what­not bet­ter than anyone alive. Using Type­pad, Blog­ger or wha­te­ver.
Well, if Bill and Ben hate each other’s guts, it’s all for naught. They ain’t going to be tal­king to each other, regard­less of how swell their toys are.
This is what I call “Ego­fric­tion”. Per­so­na­lity get­ting in the way of pro­cess.
Ego­fric­tion Era­di­ca­tion is key to the inter­nal con­ver­sa­tion of any com­pany, and it is key to the exter­nal mar­ket con­ver­sa­tion of any com­pany.
So I’m won­de­ring if there’s a mar­ket for com­pa­nies that can era­di­cate it? Ego­fric­tion Death Squads, as it were.
We live in inte­res­ting times.
[AFTERTHOUGHT:] “Ego­fric­tion deva­lues Emo­tio­nal and Inte­llec­tual Capi­tal”. Of course it does.
[AFTERTHOUGHT:] By making your pro­cess more fluid and/or trans­pa­rent in any endea­vor, you are ope­ning your­self up… you are sha­ring.
Sha­ring is an act of love.

October 10, 2004

back home

hjsdert11.jpg
Shit. I am no lon­ger in Paris.
I am no lon­ger there and it pis­ses me off.
I had my hap­piest few days in years while I was there.
You go into the slum­miest, run down cafe you can find, and they still serve good cof­fee.
Going back in early Novem­ber. Can’t wait.

October 9, 2004

last full day in paris

zzzzazzdfff01.jpg
Still in Paris. Lea­ving tomo­rrow.
Methinks I’ll be back soon…

October 8, 2004

paris doors

aaa12345703.jpg
Yes, I am still in Paris.
Paris apart­ment buil­dings are inte­res­ting. To get inside the buil­ding you first need to pass through 2 doors– the outside street door and the inside court­yard door.
Say you are visi­ting a friend in Paris and you want to ring his door­bell. The door­bell is only on the inside, by the court­yard door. To ring that, first you have to get through the street door. The only way to do that is by pres­sing a five digit code (say, 12B45) known only by the peo­ple in the buil­ding and their friends and peo­ple they trust.
So if you have an apart­ment in Paris and you have a friend coming over for the first time, you’ll say to him, “I’m at 56 Rue de Wha­te­ver. My code is 12B45. Then ring my door­bell once you get into the court­yard.“
Unless you already know the code, you don’t get in. Only peo­ple who are already trus­ted get to ring the door­bell. Door-to-door soli­ci­ta­tions just don’t hap­pen.
A sim­ple method that works.
It’s Per­mis­sion Mar­ke­ting at its finest. Some­body should invent an appli­ca­tion that does the same for e-mail. Or perhaps other giz­mos that makes mass-advertising and unso­li­ci­ted mar­ke­ting pretty much impos­si­ble.
Perhaps something like a new daily code that chan­ges every 24 hours, avai­la­ble via RSS…?
I love Paris.
[UPDATE: 6pm]
Kim Polese intro­du­ced Spi­ke­source and sud­denly Fred Wil­son plans to sell his Mic­ro­soft stock.
We’re only just get­ting used to the idea of the recor­ded music industry being toast. Bill Gates being toast is a bit har­der for us mere mor­tals to get our heads around.
Wha­te­ver. There’s a fun new space that’s ope­ning up in the busi­ness world:
“Be the best in the world or die.“
Some com­pa­nies can handle that space; others can’t. Spi­ke­source obviously thinks it can, which is what’s dri­ving the current exci­te­ment.
Like the old song says, it ain’t whatcha do, it’s the way that you do it.
The pro­por­tion of com­pa­nies that have to be able to handle that space just in order to sur­vive (let alone grow and pros­per) is expan­ding at such a fast rate it’s star­ting to get kinda thrillseeker-scary etc.
[UPDATE: SATURDAY]
Hmmm… Coca Cola has star­ted blog­ging, it seems. Using Type­pad soft­ware, it seems. Quite an amu­sing story how it wasn’t password-protected at first, and how it was soon spot­ted by the outside world.
Somebody’s head is rolling at the moment, I am sure.
OK, I’ll shut up about blogs now.
I’m still in Paris. Having fabu­lous time. Dra­wing wee car­toons on the back of busi­ness cards and han­ding them out to sweetheart Mont­par­nasse wai­tres­ses.
Heh.

October 4, 2004

london paris

zzzbambam36.jpg
Off to Lon­don for a day or two, then off to Paris for 5 days. Pos­ting from inter­net cafes for the next week. Back at my desk circa the 11th.
[UPDATE: Tues­day, 5th Octo­ber] In Lon­don. Lovely Lon­don. Apo­lo­gies to every­body I should have loo­ked up but didn’t have time etc. Only here for one full day and rather stres­sed by having too much to do in such a short time-frame etc. etc.
[UPDATE: Thurs­day, 7th Octo­ber] In Paris. I really, really like Paris. I really like the French. Why? I like the way they speak to each other. Even if you’re only buying a pack of ciga­ret­tes or wha­te­ver, when they speak to you they are very “there”, in the moment, “pre­sent” etc.
I shall be quite incom­mu­ni­cado till Sun­day at the ear­liest. I’m wri­ting this from a wee cyber­cafe near The Pom­pi­dou Cen­ter.
My French is impro­ving.
[UPDATE: Fri­day, 8th Octo­ber] Still in Paris. I still love Paris.

October 3, 2004

lend me ten bucks

zzzzzz7654123.jpg

silicon valley startup

image12345707.jpg
I have this idea for a Sil­con Valley star­tup.
It’s not really a star­tup. It’s just some crazy guy with a lap­top, a cellphone, a stack of blank busi­ness cards and some dra­wing pens. Appl­ying The Hug­train to real life, hel­ping out other star­tups express them­sel­ves bet­ter to the world.
From a recent e-mail I sent some­body, who desc­ri­bed him­self as a “Crea­tive Futu­rist”:

“Crea­tive Futu­rist” is no bad place to be. I’m more crea­tive than futu­rist, sadly, but that is quickly chan­ging.
Tech­no­lo­gists, for all their skills, have one weak spot. They want all pro­blems to be tech­no­lo­gi­cal pro­blems. That way they can fix them.
But there are also cul­tu­ral pro­blems with any large com­pany, or with any large tech imple­men­ta­tion. Tech alters values and value chains. The techie might be able to ins­tall for us the most ama­zing e-mail pro­gram, but if we hate each other’s guts, it’ doesn’t mat­ter how good the pro­gram is because we’re not tal­king too each other.
Techies think that if you ins­tall the right tools, the Cul­tu­ral Align­ment will hap­pen by itself. It doesn’t.
That’s where I think our space could be use­ful in years to come.

Obviously, this doesn’t apply to ALL tech­no­lo­gists… some more than others etc.
Tal­king to Doc Searls (again) on the phone yes­ter­day about this. West Coast, here I come. Time to join The Revo­lu­tion etc.
For a while now I’ve been ran­ting on about blogs being a great way to make things hap­pen indi­rectly, espe­cially in the job mar­ket. Finally, I think peo­ple are begin­ning to get it. The New York Times just quo­ted me: (From Page 2 of the article, last para:) “That’s the advan­tage of blog­ging– if you do it well and have inte­res­ting things to say, peo­ple pay atten­tion.“
Spea­king of Doc; from about 5 years ago in The Clue­train:

A power­ful glo­bal con­ver­sa­tion has begun. Through the Inter­net, peo­ple are dis­co­ve­ring and inven­ting new ways to share rele­vant know­ledge with blin­ding speed. As a direct result, mar­kets are get­ting smar­ter and fas­ter than most companies.

True. But once you stop thin­king of your com­pany and your mar­ket as two sepe­rate things, that pro­blem goes away.

October 2, 2004

random notes

zzzzaxxzzz01.jpg
: On the phone to Doc Searls last night. He desc­ri­bed gaping­void as “Dil­bert for folk with non-shitty jobs.” Heh.
: In the future, the only peo­ple who will ever hire you will be your regu­lar blog rea­ders. That’s already star­ting to hap­pen some peo­ple I know. Start blog­ging YESTERDAY and get buil­ding traf­fic.
: Going to Paris next week. Hoo­ray!
: Been wri­ting a lot lately. Not been uploa­ding new dra­wings so much, just repos­ting the old ones with the wri­ting etc. Take it from me– it’s really hard to write new stuff, draw new stuff AND hold down a job. I do my best but it’s not always enough.
: The Book is now circa 15 thou­sand words. It really needs to be 30 – 40 thou­sand. Arrrrgh. It wouldn’t be a pro­blem but I’m already swam­ped with other things.
: Balance, Sch­ma­lance:

At its most basic level, the ima­gery of balance doesn’t work — the teeter-totter with our work on one side and something else on the other as we strive to keep them in per­fectly equal weight.

I gave up on the idea of balance years ago (I think I was 15 at the time). Face it, Peo­ple, we’re ente­ring The Crea­tive Age. Hey, guess what? Anything crea­tive is EXTREMELY time con­su­ming.
: Paul Graham: “What The Bub­ble Got Right.“

Now the pen­du­lum has swung the other way. Now anything that became fashio­na­ble during the Bub­ble is ipso facto unfashio­na­ble. But that’s a mis­take– an even big­ger mis­take than belie­ving what ever­yone was saying in 1999. Over the long term, what the Bub­ble got right will be more impor­tant than what it got wrong.

That does it. As soon as I’m done with my current gig I’m moving West to Sili­con Valley and joi­ning The Revo­lu­tion. Guess I’ll need to find a job. Heh.

gapingblog.com

zzzzazzdggg28.jpg
“Gapingblog.com– an offshoot of Hugh MacLeod’s gaping­void and his Scot­tish web­mas­ter, Jonathan Als­tead– is a blog hos­ting ser­vice for hard­core, pro­fes­sio­nal and cor­po­rate blog­gers who are damn serious about the medium. No mes­sing around.“
I’ve gone into the blog hos­ting busi­ness. Sort of.
Johnno’s been buil­ding and hos­ting gaping­void since its incep­tion in 2001. He’s cheap, rea­lia­ble, good natu­red and honest. His elder bother is one of my oldest and dea­rest friends. I trust both of them utterly.
John does all the hos­ting, tech­ni­cal, design and what­not. My part is to help advise the client with what I know about blog­ging and com­mu­ni­ca­tion stra­tegy (which is a lot).
Clients of gapingblog.com will be able to con­sult me via e-mail on blog design, mar­ke­ting and stra­tegy (within rea­son, of course, please don’t stalk me).
I am get­ting no money for this. Just hel­ping out an old friend. John’s a ter­rri­fic guy who’s done an inc­re­di­ble job hel­ping me. We tal­ked about joi­ning for­ces for years, now we have.
A fully ope­ra­tio­nal, well-designed blog starts at about

great branding is a spiritual exercise

zzzzazzdggg59.jpg
(Just added the follo­wing to The Hugh­train:)
Great bran­ding is a spi­ri­tual exer­cise.
The pri­mary job of an adver­ti­ser is not to com­mu­ni­cate bene­fit, but to com­mu­ni­cate con­vic­tion.
Bene­fit is secon­dary. Bene­fit is a pro­duct of con­vic­tion, not vice versa.
Wha­te­ver you manu­fac­ture, some­body can make it bet­ter, fas­ter and chea­per than you.
You do not own the mole­cu­les. They are star­dust. They belong to God. What you do own is your soul. Nobody can take that away from you. And it is your soul that informs the brand.
It is your soul, and the pur­pose and beliefs that embo­dies, that peo­ple will buy into.
Ergo, great bran­ding is a spi­ri­tual exer­cise.
Why is your brand great? Why does your brand mat­ter? Seriously. If you don

October 1, 2004

generation c

zzzzaxxzzz03.jpg
Lala­rene, a young gra­duate in Los Ange­les, medi­ta­tes on The Sex & Cash Theory:

My job is confusing.…I’m defi­ni­tely not get­ting the Cash but not all of the good fee­ling Sex either (pro­bably because I know I should be get­ting the cash — almost like having sex without an orgasm…you know it’s sup­po­sed to hap­pen but some­ti­mes it just doesn’t). I want both in one pac­kage (don’t we all) so I’m care­fully mas­sa­ging my cir­cums­tan­ces to give me that. It takes time. In college we called it “paying our dues.” It sucks. But I recently ran into Tif­fany at the Spi­der Room who also gra­dua­ted with a degree in Poli­ti­cal Science (though one year before me) and now she’s a Finan­cial Analyst. She hates her job but it pays her the big bucks (Cash) so she stays.
I don’t like that com­pro­mise. Even the crea­tive out­let that I seek should be Sex & Cash together. Isn’t that what our gene­ra­tion is all about? Crea­tive Con­tent…Gene­ra­tion C. So let’s work towards Sex & Cash together fore­ver. :)

“Gene­ra­tion C”. As in “Con­tent”. Ha! I love it!
Any young per­son ente­ring the job mar­ket knows full well that we’re quickly ente­ring into what is com­monly called “The Crea­tive Age”. It’s old bug­gers like me who are having trou­ble seeing it. If you are having trou­ble, you should go read this book ASAP.

forget “customers”. think “allies”.

zzzzazzdggg86.jpg
For­get “Cus­to­mers”. Think “Allies”.
That line came to me after rea­ding an insa­nely great post from Evelyn Rodri­guez.
No empathy, no alliance. Rock on.
[CAVEAT:] She gives me a men­tion in the post (Thanks, Ev!).
Damn, she’s good. Every time I write something I have to check her blog just to make sure she hasn’t thought of it first.
[UPDATE:] Nice story from fellow Evelyn grou­pie John­nie Moore, who I think has the best Bri­tish mar­ke­ting blog:

A friend was once asked by a CEO to get his staff to have more enga­ging con­ver­sa­tions. His ins­pi­red inter­ven­tion was simply to ask the boss, “Is this an enga­ging con­ver­sa­tion?” Rather Zen like, I think that cap­tu­res the cha­llenge of get­ting con­ver­sa­tions into the here-and-now where I think change can hap­pen. What Ben and Roz Zan­der call “pos­si­bi­lity space”.

I was having a chat with a very smart Bri­tish adver­ti­sing exe­cu­tive the other day. She was telling me how “Bri­tain still has the best adver­ti­sing in the world.“
I’ve been hea­ring that for years. The more I know about adver­ti­sing, the less I agree with it.
Sure, if you’re into cash-thirsty, 30-year-old busi­ness models, then yeah, well, maybe the UK is your kind of place…
I’ll shut up now in case this turns into a rant.
[UPDATE:] Evelyn’s link was bro­ken. Fixed now. Thanks to Kathe­rine for spot­ting it.

intense longing

zzzzzz7654122.jpg
From now on if anyone asks me why say, Apple or Har­ley David­son are such great brands, all I have to do is show them this dra­wing.
And of course, if anyone asks me why their brand isn’t so hot, again, all I have to do is show them this dra­wing.
Like I’ve said before… it’s so fric­kin’ obvious.
Heh.
[UPDATE:] Just added the dra­wing to The Hugh­train.
The Hugh­train is star­ting to gel. Won­de­ring whether to expand it into a book or not. Maybe just incor­po­rate it into the book I’m already wri­ting. Not sure yet. Watch this space.