September 17, 2004

start-agains

zzaaaaaaa05.jpg
Just added the follo­wing blurb to The Hugh­train:

There

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

4 Responses to “start-agains”

  1. Auscoach says:

    Two points:
    –I’m remin­ded of a cri­ti­cal point in my marriage. We agreed that:
    (a) “Maybe we can start again with something new;” but
    (b) “This rela­tionship is over.“
    We did start again, with the advan­ta­ges of fami­lia­rity, his­tory, affec­tion etc. It wor­ked. But we had to tole­rate a period of uncer­tainty and a real burial of the old ways.
    –Agen­cies might bene­fit from tea­ming with some of the def­ter life and per­so­nal coaches who unders­tand busi­ness models. Our pro­fi­ciency can eli­cit the embed­ded knowledge&creativity of the client to dis­co­ver:
    *the actual (not gene­rally griped-about) cau­ses of the problem(s);
    *the scope and impact of the pro­blem, i.e., what actually needs to be re-invented;
    *the ideal out­come, and prioritized/triaged likely out­co­mes;
    *how to get there, inc­lu­ding size chunks of the pro­cess;
    *plau­si­ble next steps;
    *mini­mi­zing nega­tive unin­ten­ded con­se­quen­ces of change;
    and, uni­quely valua­ble
    *wor­king with the client’s values until buy-in is sin­cere, and the client willingly owns (and anti­ci­pa­tes with some plea­sure) his followth­rough.
    Along with knowledge&experience, it’s a per­so­na­lity type, maybe MBTI, more plod­dingly logical&causal than ad folks tend to be, more creative&innovative than busi­ness folk.
    Mar­kets are now about con­ver­sa­tions. A good coach is an expert in con­ver­sa­tions that go somewhere, with res­pect to all inte­rests invol­ved.
    Desig­ners appear to think they already know how to do this. In my hum­ble opi­nion, they don’t, enti­rely, yet.

  2. johnza says:

    I am glad you point this out. I am totally bia­sed because I used to work there, but Mic­ro­soft does not get enough cre­dit for doing the hard work. Not just for rein­ven­ting indus­tries bu rein­ven­ting itself — Schumpeter’s crea­tive des­truc­tion. It re-invented desk­top pro­duc­ti­vity by making it GUI. It rein­ven­ted GUI ope­ra­ting sys­tems by making them work not just on the BMW of PCs (Macs) but also on the Fords, GMs and Yugos of PCs (IBM clo­nes). It re-invented itself when it finally faced the fact of the inter­net, totally thro­wing out old assump­tions and orga­ni­za­tions and ship­ping new relea­ses every month. It has a lot of rein­ven­tion to do now. It will be inte­res­ting to see if it can still pull it off.
    Simi­larly, I love what Lou Gerst­ner did with IBM. They were old, dead, huge, slow. And somehow by embra­cing a vision of the inverse of this, taking ownership of it and dri­ving it into the org IBM became coo­ler than sh_it and the envy of Mic­ro­soft.
    VW is another. They rein­ven­ted them­sel­ves and a cate­gory. After years of doing nothing cool since the ori­gi­nal bug and get­ting pas­sed over by the Japa­nese on the one hand and BMW on the other, they did something bold. They went back to thier roots of “People’s Car” and upda­ted who the peo­ple were. “Driver’s Wan­ted” became an invi­ta­tion to a best of both worlds for ever­yone. Ever­yone could have fun dri­ving a Ger­man engi­nee­red car for the price of a Japa­nese eco­nomy one. And they bac­ked it up with great, fun cars that wor­ked.
    One last one is Jack in the Box. They have done this over and over. The brand was totally DOA. No one thought of them any­more and then they embra­ced their wierd­ness with the goofy head and all of a sud­den they got cool again.
    Sorry for going on and on about this but it struck a nerve. It takes a lot to admit errors, see others eating your lunch and then to actually do something bold about it.

  3. hugh macleod says:

    No worries, Johnza, I agree with you. Tur­ning a tired ol’ com­pany around is worth doing. And it’s fas­ci­na­ting stuff, methinks.

  4. johnza says:

    Just read an ama­zing obit in the eco­no­mist http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=3195773 about Beyers Naude. Talk about rein­ven­tion. He was a hard core apar­teid Afri­ka­ner, lea­der of the church and preacher in favor — some thought he would run the country. But after the Sharp­vi­lle mas­sacre he tur­ned com­ple­tely. He became a relent­less but never grands­tan­ding pro­tes­tor against apar­teid, alie­na­ting all his friends and family, cour­ting assa­si­na­tion and arrest and worse, denoun­ced as a trai­tor, kic­ked out of his church etc. Now they have streets named after him. Nice in these times to hear about peo­ple like him.