September 12, 2004

fragmentation of fashion

zzzzazzdggg50.jpg
Brit­ton Monasco wri­tes about “The Frag­men­ta­tion of Fashion” over at Corante. It’s a good read.
My two cents: It’s not just con­su­mers have too much choice; it’s that they’ve got­ten too smart.
They know that $100 t-shirt cost $2 to make in The Phi­lli­pi­nes. They know the super­mo­del is just as screwy, tedious and fla­wed as the rest of us.
They know there’s a short, bald guy behind the cur­tain.
Dazz­ling them with your brand isn’t as easy as it used to be. The bullshit detec­tors are a lot more power­ful than when you were back get­ting your MBA.
And they’re get­ting more power­ful every day. You know that, I know that, to pre­tend other­wise is just stu­pid and wrong.
You no lon­ger con­trol the con­ver­sa­tion, they do. All you can do is make pro­ducts that enhance the con­ver­sa­tion. That make the con­ver­sa­tion inte­res­ting and won­der­ful.
It’s what I said in The Hugh­train: “It’s not just the pro­duct. Peo­ple have to love the pro­cess as well.”
i.e. It’s not what you do, it’s the way that you do it.
Mar­kets are now fas­ter and smar­ter than you are. Without belief and pur­pose, you have nothing.

8 Responses to “fragmentation of fashion”

  1. Tom says:

    One of the things you now have to believe in is the impor­tance of actually having con­ver­sa­tions with your customers…if the trans­pon­der is always on “send” and never on “receive,” you’re screwed.

  2. Hamish says:

    Super­mo­dels are fla­key. Damn. I just assu­med that beauty and brains were theirs. Like a tree being struck by light­ning twice, more or less gua­ran­teed.
    Damn their skinny bony asses for being so, uhhmmm, hungry looking…

  3. hugh macleod says:

    Well, having con­ver­sa­tions with your cus­to­mers is tricky, once your cus­to­mer base exceeds a cou­ple of dozen. Hard enough for me to keep up with every­body who sends me an e-mail. Ima­gine if I had a pro­duct with millions of cuto­mers.
    I guess the cen­tral issue is; once you have “the con­ver­sa­tion” star­ted, how do you scale it up so the many can join in, not just the few?
    I have some ideas. You?

  4. aleah sato says:

    What is that “pro­cess” that per­sua­des, I won­der? For an exam­ple, the fact that third world fac­tory wor­kers are making big brand gar­ments — Do you believe this fact will deter peo­ple from buying their favo­rite brand? Or is it that peo­ple are simply loo­king out for num­ber 1 and refu­sing to pay what they used to pay. I sup­pose it’s a bit of both, the bene­vo­lent con­su­mer and the demys­ti­fied, cyni­cal consumer.

  5. Tom says:

    Hugh,
    Your ques­tion promp­ted me to jot down some of my ideas about con­ver­sa­tions with customers…too much to inc­lude here. Not sure if this is pro­per eti­quette, but , If you’re inte­res­ted, they’re pos­ted at:
    http://truetalk.typepad.com/truetalk/2004/09/one_of_the_thin.html

  6. hugh macleod says:

    Hey Tom, took a look at your list. Good one =)
    Aleah, well, peo­ple are a lot more self-interested than is polite to men­tion in polite society.
    Good exam­ple: peo­ple like to talk about Wal Mart put­ting Mom n’ Pop sto­res out of busi­ness. I disa­gree. I think the actual cus­to­mers put Mom n’ Pop sto­res out of busi­ness by choo­sing to shop at Wal Mart ins­tead.
    But that is a con­ten­tious issue…

  7. vanselus says:

    Exactly why i’ve fired the last 3 ad agen­cies i’ve wor­ked with — because the lies stop wor­king.
    “My two cents: It’s not just con­su­mers have too much choice; it’s that they’ve got­ten too smart.”
    Then try honesty! I know its hard for the industry to grasp, but honest mar­ke­ting IS possible.

  8. hugh macleod says:

    Amen, Van­se­lus.