June 30, 2004

exherent drama

zzzzsteak20.jpg
Leo Bur­nett, the great man who foun­ded my for­mer com­pany, coi­ned the phrase “Inhe­rent Drama.”
It’s a phrase which has since infor­med 50 years of adver­ti­sing and mar­ke­ting.
Alfred Hitch­cock once said, “Film is life with all the boring bits remo­ved.” And this is basi­cally what drama is.
Ergo, it’s the ad agency’s job to find the product’s “inhe­rent drama” and capi­ta­lize on it.
For ins­tance, your hus­band is stuck in a horri­ble snows­torm. You’re worried. That’s drama.
He makes it home after dum­ping the car and wal­king 5 miles in the snow. That’s drama.
When he gets home he’s cold, wet and exhuas­ted– you hug and kiss him, overwhel­med with relief. That’s drama.
So you make him a nice, fat cup of Hersey’s hot cho­co­late. That’s the inhe­rent drama of the Hershey pro­duct. It’s the pro­duct “being there” during a cru­cial junc­ture of your life.
Which is pre­ci­sely why we’ve had 50 years of Daddy-stuck-in-the-snow com­mer­cials. We have all these pro­ducts to ram down your cru­cial junc­tu­res. How very con­si­de­rate of us.
Peo­ple are sick of it, obviously. The­re­fore I pro­pose that adver­ti­sers move on from inhe­rent drama. But where to?
Easy. “Exhe­rent Drama” (i.e. oppo­site of inhe­rent, “outside” as oppo­sed to “inside” etc).
i.e. when a brand stops being a thing, and starts being a place.

I often refer to this as “The Kine­tic Qua­lity”. Rock on.

2 Responses to “exherent drama”

  1. Christine says:

    In kee­ping with the topic of the oppo­sing “dra­mas”, it appears that you are sug­ges­ting that the ten­dency now is to pro­duce com­mer­cials that every­man can iden­tify with as the “boring moments” in life as the selling force for the pro­duct.
    For exam­ple: sit­ting on the beach; watching the sun set; buc­ket of Coro­nas on ice in wait; cell phone rings; toss phone into ocean; result — avoid drama.
    This com­mer­cial has indeed influen­ced my purcha­sing habits. Any pro­duct that publicly denoun­ces Drama (and pro­mo­tes sit­ting on the beach with a cold liba­tion) will gain my loyalty.

  2. hugh macleod says:

    That’s an inte­res­ting way of loo­king at it. Indeed =)
    I think it’s also a rea­li­sa­tion that the “pro­duct” isn’t the only part of the equa­tion.
    As Apple or Har­ley David­son so won­der­fully illus­trate; it’s not just about “Pro­duct”. Peo­ple have to also fall in love with the thing that came before the pro­duct i.e. “The Pro­cess”.
    By making your proc­cess more trans­pa­rent in any endea­vor, you are ope­ning your­self up… you are sha­ring.
    Sha­ring is an act of love.