June 2, 2004

the hughtrain manifesto

hugh9876.jpg
1. Been scou­ring the net and the bookshops and what­not. Hot mar­ke­ting word du jour: “Trans­pa­rency”.
Yep, we’re all f – cking trans­pa­rent now. From the guy who cleans your pool to Gene­ral F – cking Motors. Rock on.
2. “Adver­ti­sing is Dead.” Yep, bas­tards like me are no lon­ger going to try to sell you anything. You heard it here first.
3. “Blogs cure can­cer”. Yep, so now you can go tell that expen­sive che­mothe­ra­pist of yours to go f – k him­self.
4. “Alter­na­tive Adver­ti­sing” is really hot right now. So ins­tead of adver­ti­sing on TV or Peo­ple Maga­zine like a nor­mal per­son, you show your boss you’re “with it” by hiring one of these ‘Alter­na­tive’ adver­ti­sing agen­cies and get­ting their army of free­lance college girls to smear their pert, young breasts with your company’s pro­duct and march around the cam­pus a’giggling. Hope­fully “word of mouth” is gene­ra­ted, the media “picks it up” and sud­denly you’re no lon­ger refe­rred to as “Cube Boy” around the office.
5. We’re all about “empo­wer­ment” these days. We have great need to be cons­tantly remin­ded by the brands we buy into that we’re not the flac­cid nonen­ti­ties we spent most of our lives belie­ving we were. So ins­tead of it saying “Powe­red by Blog­ger” on your web­site (a per­fectly rea­so­na­ble and suc­cinct phrase, in my opio­nion), you now have “I power Blog­ger”. So now peo­ple are going to laugh at you less. Right.
6. What makes the hi-tech/internet/dotcom client attrac­tive to the ad busi­ness isn’t their actual pro­ducts, it’s their cus­to­mers.
What is attrac­tive is the idea of selling pro­ducts made by smart peo­ple (e.g. com­pu­ters, iPods etc) to other smart peo­ple (e.g. techies, entre­pre­neurs, college profs). As oppo­sed to selling pro­ducts made by smart peo­ple (baked beas, candy bars, soap pow­der) to dumb peo­ple (wel­fare mothers, red­neck sports fans), the lat­ter being 90% of what the ad busi­ness does to pay its bills.
Selling to peo­ple of your own cali­ber is gene­rally a far more rewar­ding way to spend one’s time than selling to peo­ple you wouldn’t want to invite into your own house. Which is why the best agen­cies get to work on those accounts, and why hi-tech accounts get more than their fair share of adver­ti­sing and mar­ke­ting acco­la­des.
7. We seem overly fond of “Zen” ima­gery these days. Whe­ne­ver pos­si­ble we like to design our com­pany logos to resem­ble sumi ink dra­wings from 17th cen­tury Zen Mas­ters and what­not.
We like Zen because it has all that com­for­ting, cal­ming, medi­ta­tive, spi­ri­tual sch­tick without the insis­tence that we believe in anything too spe­ci­fic or counter-intuitive. Unlike say, Chris­tia­nity or Islam.
So if your com­pany can­not come up with its own spi­ri­tual sch­tick, Zen is the easiest “big one” to appro­priate without appea­ring too tacky.
8. The future of adver­ti­sing is… never using the words “future of adver­ti­sing” in con­ver­sa­tion. Don’t even ask.
9. Regu­lar rea­ders will have heard me men­tion The Clue­train Mani­festo: “All mar­kets are con­ver­sa­tions.“
OK, I’ll up the ante.
The Hugh­train Mani­festo: “All pro­ducts are con­ver­sa­tions.“
Again, you heard it here first. Heh.

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

16 Responses to “the hughtrain manifesto”

  1. Dean says:

    I hope you don’t mind — I’ve pla­ced a link through to your site from my blog at
    http://www.adagency.blogspot.com

  2. hugh macleod says:

    Groovy, Dean. Thanks =)

  3. Brands are fee­ded through uni­que and indi­vi­dual expe­rien­ces that go beyond the func­tio­nal bene­fit; These expe­rien­ces dif­fer from each per­son*, they belong to those who feel them — not the ones that pro­vide them. The­re­fore: Brands belong to peo­ple, they belong to the con­su­mers because they’re the ones who give an intan­gi­ble mea­ning to them. The brand mana­ger or mar­ke­ter that does not unders­tand this self-evident fact is on the wrong path. As Kevin Roberts (CEO Saatchi & Saatchi) poin­ted out: Trust­marks don’t belong to com­pa­nies. Trust­marks belong to the peo­ple. I own Fast Com­pany maga­zine. I want it every month. I want to read it, to take it apart, and to spread it around to my friends. The edi­tors of Wall­pa­per don’t own that maga­zine. I own Wall­pa­per. It’s not theirs, it’s mine — and they’d bet­ter not fuck with me.” :) :)

  4. hugh macleod says:

    True to a point, Hid­den.… but it goes further than that. i’ll blog about it in a day or so

  5. Tom says:

    Check out what pro­duct desig­ners are up these days. For years they have been seeing pro­ducts as way to inte­ract with the con­su­mer. Where con­su­mer really beco­mes not such a sui­ta­ble expres­sion.
    They are thin­king about the pro­duct as part of the con­ver­sa­tion and doing it, too. There’s some won­der­ful work by Dunne+Raby at the Royal College of Art in Lon­don and also inte­res­ting stuff hap­pe­ning at Tisch in New York, and Japan and Italy and it’s all there.

  6. Dreamz says:

    Take your con­cepts one step further… mar­ket other people’s pro­ducts and ser­vi­ces and reap the bene­fits and rewards. Or just fail mise­rably. It’s like a fun­drai­ser for your­self.
    Coke GPS

  7. Dear Cor­po­ra­tions of the world:
    We’re worn out from your intru­sive adver­ti­sing, and our cons­tant efforts to avoid it.
    WE PROPOSE A PARTNERSHIP. Rather than sell us your visions and dreams, you become the spon­sors of our dreams. Put some of your bud­get into sup­por­ting our pro­jects — we will appre­ciate your sup­port and pass along the posi­tive word-of-mouth. Also, by piggy-backing on our pro­jects (film fes­ti­vals, gallery shows, web­si­tes, par­ties, etc.) you will access our friends and asso­cia­tes. We can show you how effec­tive and effi­cient this can be.
    This “patron adver­ti­sing” is a more effec­tive way to build rela­tionships with influen­cers and their net­works. Its also a way to change our per­cep­tion of your brand.
    Think about it.
    The Urban Pio­neer Pro­ject
    http://www.urbanpioneerproject.com

  8. Mike says:

    Hugh,
    Fer­nando Flo­res crea­ted an entire busi­ness pro­cess theory around the con­cept that “All work of any inte­res­ting level of com­ple­xity is con­ver­sa­tion.” He then built a for­mal metho­do­logy for desc­ri­bing work­flows as con­ver­sa­tions bet­ween cus­to­mers and pro­vi­ders, along with spe­ci­fic sub­flow tem­pla­tes, etc. At first it seems strange, but it works BETTER than magic, because the inner wor­kings of magic are obs­cu­red.
    All hail the Hugh­train Manifesto!

  9. hugh macleod says:

    Mike… wow, that sounds really inte­res­ting… got a URL for it? Don’t e-mail it– post it here so others can see it ;-)

  10. A client of mine is all into Fer­nando Flo­res and other thin­kers of that genre. It’s all __very__ inte­res­ting stuff if you like to think. It makes all the cluetrain/gluetrain stuff look pretty ama­teu­rish.
    Here’s an FC article:
    http://www.fastcompany.com/online/21/flores.html

  11. Mike says:

    Hugh,
    The Fast Com­pany article Gah­lord men­tions doesn’t speak directly to the work­flow theory. Here’s another one that goes into more detail:
    http://cne.gmu.edu/modules/workflow/workflow-coordination.html
    Take a look and let me know what you think.

  12. hugh macleod says:

    Mike, Gah­lord, thanks for the info. Very inte­res­ting stuff =)
    Yeah, after a while Clue­train gets a bit… weary. It’s too techie-centric. As if RSS is going to solve your company’s $120 million loss last quar­ter. Right.

  13. Con­tent Syn­di­ca­tion with RSS (and Atom, Second Edition)

    Ear­lier this week I sent, in an unhap­pily enor­mous set of email attach­ments, the first draft of the second edi­tion of my book on RSS to its tech­ni­cal revie­wers. It’s a huge rew­rite, with whole new sec­tions on Atom, unconventional…

  14. Con­tent Syn­di­ca­tion with RSS (and Atom, Second Edition)

    Ear­lier this week I sent, in an unhap­pily enor­mous set of email attach­ments, the first draft of the second edi­tion of my book on RSS to its tech­ni­cal revie­wers. It’s an almost total rew­rite, with whole new sec­tions on Atom…

  15. The Busi­ness Blog­ging Field Guide, Part 2: The Tour Guide

    “Tour Guide” blogs are the ones that give a glimpse into the com­pany. Not unlike an actual phy­si­cal plant tour, this type of blog gives a “behind the sce­nes” glimpse into the goings-on of the cor­po­rate machi­nery. Some­ti­mes they cover

  16. Hugh Mac­leod

    TRAFFIC: In your own words, can you intro­duce your­self to ‘our’ world?

    HM: I’m a blog­ger with a rather unre­mar­ka­ble back­ground as an adver­ti­sing copyw­ri­ter. I also am quite well known for dra­wing car­toons on…