May 2, 2004

saatchi’s love marks

BAR wee.jpg
From CNN: “Under Roberts’ gui­dance, Saatchi and Saatchi doesn’t talk war, it talks love, the art of adver­ti­sing is the art of seduction.”

ROBERTS: What’s going to stand out now is those brands that (UNINTELLIGIBLE) into something we’re calling love marks, which is, ins­tead of being built on infor­ma­tion, you now have to be built on a rela­tionship, because a rela­tionship is much more impor­tant than infor­ma­tion. You choose your part­ner on the basis of how you feel, not on an analy­ti­cal benefit.

Har­ley David­son, I think, is an unbe­lie­va­ble love mark. Or at Zippo ligh­ter, it’s a fan­tas­tic love mark. Coca-Cola is a love mark, and McDonald’s is a love mark. I mean, you don’t go to McDonald’s for the food, you go to McDonald’s because the expe­rience of socia­li­zing and so on is fantastic.

SCHUCH: Other great love marks? Think sen­sual, like the iMac com­pu­ter, or the Volks­wa­gen Beetle, and think of Kevin Roberts as less of a CEO and more of the guar­dian of the Saatchi and Saatchi love marks.

Inte­res­ting article on an inte­res­ting guy. He’s got a new book out called “Love Marks: The Future Beyond Brands”.
I pretty much agree with his ‘Love’ sch­tick, but there’s a dis­con­nect:
It’s nice to pitch “Love” as the cen­ter of your cor­po­rate reli­gion, but the rea­lity is Saatchi’s is a publi­cally tra­ded com­pany.
i.e. a publi­cally tra­ded com­pany, gover­ned by Wall Street, is trying to preach to the world on the sub­ject of ‘Love’.
Too funny.
If the stock price goes down the “Love” thing goes out the win­dow 5 minu­tes later. Watch this space.
ALSO: Con­cep­tually it’s won­der­ful, but I really, really do not like the term “Love Marks”. Sounds like ‘Hic­kies’.
Note to myself: Come up with bet­ter term to desc­ribe same con­cept, to work into my agency pitch. Ker-chiiing!!

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

4 Responses to “saatchi’s love marks”

  1. Dorothy says:

    Always loved Saatchi’s con­cept of Love­Marks, made me feel warm & fuzzy inside. But now, it will fore­ver be asso­cia­ted with hic­kies. Thanks. Priceless.

  2. johnza says:

    Peo­ple at my for­mer emplo­yer used to call me “Love Pac­kage.” Not for the rea­sons I pro­bably would have liked the most at the time, but because of a mar­ke­ting tac­tic I had impor­ted from Ame­ri­can Express. The tac­tic was to iden­tify cus­to­mers at risk of not rene­wing and send them a gift right before rene­wal time. A “love pac­kage” that remin­ded them how much we appre­cia­ted their con­ti­nued patro­nage.
    It wor­ked super well. Just goes to show you that all this mar­ke­ting stuff is all about emo­tion any­way. We all —  whether we’re selling or buying —  just want to be loved…

  3. Louis Stack says:

    I likes this book as it gives us all something to look for­ward to in the future. If hes right then it might just be a little nice to exist on this pla­net we call home. Pas­sion is good for us as peo­ple, and I would rather give my money to a com­pany full of pas­sion than the chea­pest bidder.

  4. Christian Saylor says:

    When we reach the brain first we fail to con­nect, design beco­mes to much about the func­tion. Howe­ver when we reach the heart first we have become emo­tio­nally attached. So many indi­vi­duals don’t fully unders­tand the role that pas­sion and emo­tion play within our worlds, Saatchi has re-ignited the “love” of design again…