March 21, 2004

blogs as mass-advertising medium (cont.)

zzzzsteak22.jpg
Danny made a good point in a pre­vious post:

That is where I think the ulti­mate evo­lu­tion of this con­cept will take us. Let’s say Ford crea­tes a blog for F-150 enthu­siasts. Ford gets to take advan­tage of a DM setup with the added advan­tage of actually crea­ting rela­tionships with cus­to­mers and poten­tial cus­to­mers – it’s a cheap, effec­tive way of crea­ting buzz among a highly tar­ge­ted audience for your new pro­jects AND a sim­ple way to gather highly tar­ge­ted mar­ket research.
Plus, auto­mo­tive acces­sory manu­fac­tu­rers, hunting/fishing/outdoors manu­fac­tu­rers and retai­lers, and pro­bably a hun­dred other tpyes of com­pa­nies can place an ad in an envi­ron­ment where easily 80 per­cent of its rea­dership is in their tar­get mar­ket as well (Isn’t that pretty much what hap­pe­ned with Hugh and AdRants?).
In this light, cre­di­bi­lity and rea­da­bi­lity are going to be para­mount con­cerns when com­pa­nies set out to create a blog for self-promotion, as oppo­sed to the “I wanna be like Jen­ni­fer Annis­ton” com­ple­xes dri­ving the ad pla­ce­ment for TV.

Ah. Nice to see some­body who gets the whole “blog­ver­ti­sing” sch­tick.
I had a phone con­ver­sa­tion with a big-ad-agency friend in Chi­cago the other day.
“Sorry to be harsh,” he said. “I don’t care what kind of media it is– news­pa­per, maga­zine, web­site, wha­te­ver– but all that mat­ters to a big adver­ti­sing client is how many peo­ple read your thing and what kind of peo­ple they are.“
I actually do agree with that; it’s exactly what they care about. Am I mis­ta­ken to think such a narrow view might be wrong?

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

Comments are currently closed. You can follow me on Twitter.