February 24, 2004

“the kinetic quality”: the future of advertising

Send to Kindle

zzzbambam35.jpg
“The Kine­tic Qua­lity”: All pro­ducts are infor­ma­tion. The mole­cu­les are secon­dary.
(UPDATE: For more info go here: “The Hugh­train Mani­festo.”)
The future of brands is inte­rac­tion, not com­mo­dity. It’s not something you buy, but something you pati­ci­pate in.

i.e. a brand is not a thing, but a place.

Here’s an exam­ple: My for­mer agency was pitching Ger­ber ( the US baby food com­pany) a few years ago. During the pitch I told them “you don’t know a lot about babies because you make great pro­ducts. You make great pro­ducts because you know a lot about babies.“
Think about it. The ave­rage 22-year-old new mom doesn’t go into a Ken­tucky Wal-Mart loo­king for baby food. She goes into Wal-Mart loo­king for infor­ma­tion. She wants any infor­ma­tion she can get about how to be a bet­ter mother, and she’s willing to spend money to get it.
After she has the infor­ma­tion, then she wants pro­ducts that are cre­di­ble exten­sions of the infor­ma­tion. A good baby-food brand is merely an exten­sion of good pae­dia­tric nutri­tion.… i.e. put the infor­ma­tion first, and the pro­ducts and sales will follow.
So what we pitched was tur­ning their Wal-Mart shelf space into minia­ture “infor­ma­tion cen­ters”. We’d sell the pro­ducts, obviously, but there would be other things as well– books, lea­flets, CD-Roms etc etc. Basi­cally, a young mother would leave Wal-Mart a lot more infor­med about babies than when she ente­red… and her shop­ping bags full of Ger­ber pro­ducts. This is what I mean about “the kine­tic qua­lity” of a brand. A good brand offers imme­diate and obvious trans­for­ma­tion.
If Mom doesn’t leave Wal-Mart a bet­ter infor­med mom than when she ente­red, then somewhere along the line Ger­ber isn’t doing its job.
Of course a good Ger­ber website/blog would enhance this pro­cess. The TV and maga­zine cam­paigns would be more infor­ma­tive than ‘selling’. All under the umbre­lla con­cept of “Healthy Hap­pi­ness Hints”. Giving little par­cels of mana­ga­ble infor­ma­tion, com­mu­ni­ca­ted as “hints”.
My point is: the kine­tic qua­lity applies as much to pac­kage goods (baby food) as it does to media brands (The Eco­no­mist, The Wall Street Jour­nal etc). A good mar­ke­ter unders­tands this, and tries to tap into it.
In the old days, the three most impor­tant words in adver­ti­sing were “Uni­que Selling Pro­po­si­tion”. To me, the three most impor­tant words are “By Inte­rac­ting With…“

–By inte­rac­ting with Ger­ber, she beco­mes a better-informed mom.
–By inte­rac­ting with The Wall Street Jour­nal, she beco­mes more tuned into the world of capi­ta­lism.
–By inte­rac­ting with Apple, she brings her entre­pre­neu­rial dreams clo­ser to rea­lity.
–By inte­rac­ting with McDonald’s, her busy sche­dule is made slightly easier by avoi­ding a lot of fuss over lunch.
–By inte­rac­ting with Rals­ton Purina, she beco­mes more attached to her canine friend.
–By inte­rac­ting with your brand, she becomes…?

A good brand is a two-way con­ver­sa­tion.
What we blog­gers know about the nature of infor­ma­tion (a great deal) can be applied far beyond our usual diet of media, poli­tics and jour­na­lism. Because all pro­ducts are infor­ma­tion. The mole­cu­les are secon­dary.
Which is why I believe this is a very exci­ting time for all of us.
[UPDATE:]
Jeff Jar­vis (at Buzzmachine.com) has star­ted blog­ging about the very same sub­ject and men­tio­ned this very post. Thanks, Jeff :)
btw: I left the follo­wing thought in his com­ment sec­tion:
“My advice to clients vis-a-vis the inter­net is: the infras­truc­ture is not here yet, but it’s coming. In the mean­time, just start the con­ver­sa­tion and keep it going. Make your mis­ta­kes and push your­self up the lear­ning curve as fast as you can while the baby is still in its infancy. Believe me, when the next big wave begins (1 – 4 years?) you’ll be glad you did.”

Be Socia­ble, Share!

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

13 Responses to ““the kinetic quality”: the future of advertising”

  1. Great stuff, Hugh! As a fellow copyw­ri­ter (and blog­ger) here in Ger­many I hope Your Cluetrain-inspired (?) Kine­tic Qua­lity idea of how communications/advertising/branding should and will work in the near future has a chance to drip into the brains of the mar­ke­ting guys industry-wide.

  2. hugh macleod says:

    I think it will, Roland, though I think it will take a while. Too much money to be made pre­ten­ding things haven’t changed.

  3. Hugh Cheswright says:

    Hugh
    Great lunch yes­ter­day.
    We have an inte­res­ting and wealthy future coming right up.
    Talk to you soon.
    Hugh

  4. steve tobin says:

    i only read a few entries, but i must say your thoughts are very much “bor­der­line bri­lliant.“
    thanks.
    i’ll be back
    steve
    cross chan­nel technologies

  5. Manny says:

    I never thought of going into the adver­ti­sing busi­ness, i never had the pre­vi­ledge of going to a for­mal school to learn this stuff, i lear­ned by lis­te­ning and being aware of my envi­ron­ment, more of a gut feel, and that is how i base my design and approach poten­tial client, i am from the Phi­lip­pi­nes and frankly the field here is still pla­yed the tra­di­tio­nal way, it works though direct approach more to the heart of the buying public, you should see the ads for Mcdo­nalds, i’m still drea­ming but i wish i could follow the foots­teps of David Ogilvy, for me he is one of the most bri­lliant per­son in this field, i wish i could also get to meet and talk to peo­ple like you who has a dif­fe­rent view on this, need to know more, if not i’ll just go back to repai­ring bus­ted TV’s and stereo’s

  6. Manny says:

    I never thought of going into the adver­ti­sing busi­ness, i never had the pre­vi­ledge of going to a for­mal school to learn this stuff, i lear­ned by lis­te­ning and being aware of my envi­ron­ment, more of a gut feel, and that is how i base my design and approach poten­tial client, i am from the Phi­lip­pi­nes and frankly the field here is still pla­yed the tra­di­tio­nal way, it works though direct approach more to the heart of the buying public, you should see the ads for Mcdo­nalds, i’m still drea­ming but i wish i could follow the foots­teps of David Ogilvy, for me he is one of the most bri­lliant per­son in this field, i wish i could also get to meet and talk to peo­ple like you who has a dif­fe­rent view on this, need to know more, if not i’ll just go back to repai­ring bus­ted TV’s and stereo’s

  7. Rich...! says:

    No bor­der­line about it Steve, just absa­fuc­kin­glu­tely brilliant…!

  8. N/. says:

    This is bri­lliant! I read it over and over again and find it just brilliant…

  9. John Fuller says:

    If you guys keep stro­king his ego it is going to squirt you in the face, you bet­ter watch out!

  10. Chris says:

    I’ve been having these kind of con­ver­sa­tions with clients since day one — the only dif­fe­rence is, not being Ame­ri­can, I don’t build a web­site, blow my own trum­pet and go on about how great I am. I knew I was doing something wrong.
    Chris. Copywriter/CD

  11. A Hunny says:

    yeah, modest Chris doesn’t overdo it or anything…

  12. jai tasty says:

    u ube­rroc­ker! me copyrocker!:)

  13. Sandra Banister says:

    …oddest sen­sa­tion Hugh, to hear my hid­den voice through you.
    Fee­ling a sin­cere admi­ra­tion for your abi­lity to trans­cend and inc­lude all the levels/world views of your per­so­nal and not sepe­ra­ble pro­fes­sioanl path ( sex/cash).
    I’ve re-remembered my Everest..and am gee­ring up for the assent.
    A deep, heart-felt thank you.